Reviews

XF18-120mm -A Good Zoom Lens for Photographers?

First of all, I would like to thank Ms Carmen, Marketing Manager of Fujifilm Singapore, for loaning the XF18-120mm and X-S10. By the time this review is online, the units had returned back to Fujifilm Singapore.

Fujifilm XF18-120mm f4 LM PZ WR
Fujifilm XF18-120mm f4 LM PZ WR

In this hands-on experience, I used this lens for photography only and nothing related to videography. Because I do not know about videography, I shall leave it to the experts to review from the videographers’ point of view.

Conclusion (TL;DR)

I am doing something different and decided to push up my conclusion so that you guys can decide to skip or continue to check out this lens.

Over the course of 2 weeks, as a prime lens user, I enjoy every single moment of using it. It brings me back to the fun of using a zoom lens without sacrificing image quality. As for the power zoom functionality, it took me about half a day to get used to it. After all, I started learning photography in the “power zoom” era.

This is a constant f4 lens and it may not have a large aperture like f2 or f2.8 and might not please some potential videographers. But every lens created has its purpose and every lens does come with pros and cons. Just how we weigh them before getting the lens, it’s up to the individual.

Of course, if you are looking for a faster lens than this and they are already existed in the market, the red badge and the MK lenses.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f5.6 . 1/640″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Personally, this lens is a great lens that has great versatility. Fujifilm strikes a good balance between compactness and image quality, is lightweight and has very useful focal lengths. From a photographer’s perspective, this lens is on my recommendation list.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @33.9mm . f4 . 1/1500″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Intro

Fujifilm XF18-120mm f4 LM PZ WR was first teased in X Summit PRIME 2021 and finally announced in X Summit OMIYA 2022. And now, it should starts shipping in September 2022. This lens has a focal length that is equivalent to 27mm – 183mm in the 35mm film format which gives whopping 6.7x times zoom. It is probably the most versatile constant aperture zoom lens from Fujifilm yet.

During the X Summit OMIYA, Fujifilm emphasised that this lens is designed for videographers in mind and based on the expertise Fujifilm has in the broadcast industry. But can photographers use this lens for general photography purposes?

Design & Build Quality & Something more…

For a start, this lens is tall but a tad shorter than XF70-300mm. It comes with a 72mm filter size and internal zoom (yeah!). From the appearance, it gives an impression that this is a heavy lens but the 460 grams on this lens do not feel that way. The lens body is built out of polycarbonate material but I believe these are some of the reasons to explain why. (These are my guesses and not from any official Fujifilm statement.)

Fujifilm XF18-120mm f4 LM PZ WR and Fujifilm XF70-300mm f4-5.6 R LM OIS WR

First, it helps to reduce the overall weight. The lens is designed for portability so that videographers who wish to pair it with any cameras can balance it well and can use it handheld for long hours without stressing the arms.

Second, it might help bring down some costs and allow more potential videographers to reach out for this lens.

On a side note, when the lens and camera are mounted on a gimbal, the videographer does not need to recalibrate the gimbal when changing to any focal length.

Overall, the built quality is great and does not feel cheap at all. For forgetting that it comes with weather-resistant too!

If you have noticed, this lens does not come with an aperture ring. But it comes with 3 ways of zoom functionalities (zoom ring, zoom/focus control ring and zoom button) and a manual focus ring. It also comes with a button named Z/F (Zoom/Focus). This is also the first lens I have ever seen having 3 options to choose from. How do these 3 zoom functions work? Let me try to explain it.

Zoom ring – It works like what it is intended but with a little twist. The focal length actually changes “electronically”. The experience is different from what the usual manual zoom ring has, it does not have that “instant” zoomed focal length. What it gives is a steady zoom in and out. However, I will not recommend photographers to use this zoom ring to change the focal length from 18mm to 120mm and vice versa. The throw is approximately 360° from 18mm to 120mm which takes me 4 times to complete. (Update: the production unit takes approximately 90° from 18mm to 120mm) What I do is to use it as a compliment to the next zoom functionality. For example, some small fine-tuning to the focal length which I feel is easier than using the zoom/focus control ring.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/800″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Zoom/focus control ring – When I use this control ring, it kind of reminded me of my first camcorder. Clockwise for telephoto-zoom and anti-clockwise for wide-zoom. It is that simple. Sometimes, I overshoot the desired focal length, and I come to have a habit of using the zoom ring to adjust. At least it works for me. Of course, you still can use the zoom control ring to adjust to the desired focal length.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/680″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Zoom button – there are 2 buttons, the “up” button for telephoto zoom and the “down” button for wide-zoom. Basically, you press once and it will zoom in or out all the way. Press the button again to stop zooming. I did not use these buttons after exploring how it works and I believe this is more useful for videographers.

Image Quality

Usually, when comes to a zoom lens, especially having such a long zoom, I have this mindset indicating that the image quality is probably somewhere sub-par or slight above sub-par image quality.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f7.1 . 1/280″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Well. I think I have to change my way of thinking. The image quality is great. Sharp and have a good level of contrast. I enjoy the results coming out from this lens. The optical is really great even at wide-open.

It may not have the most bokehlicious result but it does render pretty smooth for a zoom lens. It does not give harsh and hard bokeh at all. As for the sunny star, this lens doesn’t seem to give a sharp one, even at its smallest aperture.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 18mm . f22 . 1/80″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

From my observation, chromatic aberration and vignetting are nowhere to be seen or at least very mild. This is something I am not surprised about as Fujifilm has controlled well in this aspect, especially for all the recent newer lenses.

Focusing

When comes to focusing, I have this repute that the focusing speed for a zoom lens is generally slower than a prime lens. Again, I was wrong but not completely wrong. Under the sun, focusing is pretty fast across all focal lengths. Though it is not blazing fast like the new generation prime lenses like XF23mm f1.4, it is just a tad slower. But when comes to low light situations, the wide to mid-tele focal lengths are still considerably fast. You will know that it is not as fast as the day but it is still within my acceptable range. At 120mm, the little struggle comes in. But I still manage to lock my focus after a few tries. For all that, I think it is expected behaviour for a long focal length like other lenses.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 103.7mm . f4 . 1/34″ . ISO 1600 . Classic Neg

One thing to note is that this lens is capable of optically parfocal, which means my subject is able to stay in focus throughout the entire focal length. But I think it is more useful for videography than photography?

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/40″ . ISO 1600 . Classic Neg

Minimum Focus Distance (MFD)

I also do observe some soft characteristics in the out-of-focus area. I pretty much like this kind of rendering.

The MFD is 60cm. At 18mm, I am not able to get close up, rather, I am pretty far from my subject. When you shoot at 120mm, it appears to be fairly close to the subject. Yet far from what a macro lens can achieve.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/300″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg
Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/15010″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Something to note.

If you power off your camera, the focal length will be where you left off. Say if you shoot at 50mm and then power it off and on again after some time, it will remain at 50mm. That’s also applied even if you swap lenses and then swap back.

If you want to use this lens to shoot streets, you can but this lens is not as discreet as compact prime lenses. Some strangers might even notice you first before you shoot them.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/480″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Side by Side

This range of focal length is always very competitive and Fujifilm has quite a few zoom lenses somewhat close to one another in the market. Namely, XF16-80mm, XF18-135mm, and the most underrated XF18-55mm. Not forgetting about the recently announced Tamron 17-70mm f2.8 and upcoming Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 too. Having said that, the most direct competition, for now, is the XF16-80mm.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 57.9mm . f4 . 1/85″ . ISO 640 . Classic Neg
Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 52.5mm . f4 . 1/20″ . ISO 1000 . Classic Neg

Both are constant f4 lenses. The typical advantages between both lenses are pretty noticeable. One wider, one has more reach, OIS versus non-OIS. While I do not test the XF16-80mm fully, I understand from some photographers that the lens is soft at wide open. And I may be biased, but the X18-120mm seems to have better image quality. Nevertheless, at the end of the day, both lenses serve different groups of photographers.

Who is this for?

For travelling photographers who might want to go as light as possible, this lens is also a good option to choose from. As this is an f4 lens, which also means that it might be a little struggling for night street shoots, I will suggest pairing it up with an In-Body Image Stabilization camera or an ultra-fast prime lens to go along with it.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/160″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Because it has such great versatility, it can be used for almost anything from streets, editorial, documentaries, landscapes, cityscapes, product shots, and even portraits.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 32.3mm . f4 . 1/105″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg
Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/600″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

For photographers who do videography occasionally, I also think this is a good piece of glass to have.

Thank you for reading.

Disclaimer:
1. All the shots taken here are shot by me.
2. Some of the shots
 are straight out of the camera while others are edited via In-Camera Raw Processing and Capture One.
3. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.
4. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you like my content and you want to show some support, you can buy me a coffee here.

photowalk

The First Ever FujiFanBoys Photo Walk

I have organized quite a few small groups of photo walk for the past 2 years but this is the first photo walk organized under the name of FujiFanBoys Facebook Group. I am excited because this is my first attempt to organize with Ivan Joshua Loh with such a huge group size together. In case you wonder, this is a whopping 40 pax group size.

Not only that, we have lens support from 5 amazing brands: Fujifilm, Sigma, Tamron, TTArtisan and Voigtländer. Really appreciate their kind support!

This first walk is not an easy one, to begin with, the weather decides to rain heavily in the morning. Instead of starting photo walking at 8:45am, we delay it an hour later. Now come to think of it, the rain actually gives us a good opportunity to mingle around with the group before the walk.

Morning coffee before the photo walk
Briefing commences…
Have a can of beer before the photo walk starts.
Hello to Otter from Zouk Otter Family

Despite the rainy morning, I am glad that the majority of the FujiFanBoys and FanGirls choose to turn up for the walk! Hope we will arrange another one soon!

Photo by Jere of Fujifilm.
Thank you to Sean for taking this portrait shot of me with the new X-H2S and XF18-120mm

Thank you for reading.

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you like my content and you want to show some support, you can buy me a coffee here.

Discussion

Is X-H2S Priced Right?

X-summit Omiya 2022 has come and gone. It was an announcement of something we have expected and something that we are unexpected.

Thanks to the hints from the previous X-summit and rumors websites, we are pretty much prepared for gears such as X-H2S, XF18-120mm, and XF150-600mm to be announced in this X-summit and truly, they did. Under development XF56mm f1.2 MK II was also finally announced on stage. The statement was sort of confirming what the rumors websites had been suggesting. Of course, I am excited about this piece of the announcement and I can’t wait to get the lens in my hand.

The unexpected announcement, at least to me, is the XF8mm f3.5 and XF30mm f2.8 macro. Fuji hits 2 of my favorites spots; ultra-wide lens and macro lens. I think I will own them some days but I guess I have to prioritize my wishlist first.

*In case you wonder, I am not a G.A.S person and I am not the person who love to buy and sell gears.

Back to the topic, after the price of the X-H2S was announced. A lot of comments flooding the online community. The comments that caught my eyes the most are “X-H2S priced evenly to Canon R6 and Sony A7 IV. Is the price worth it? For this price, I rather go for full-frame.” And many similar statements were made.

Well, if you want to make a comparison, there is no end to comparing this and that. People will always find justification to uphold their judgment. Of course, there is no right or wrong. It is just an individual opinion.

I bring back the comparison on pricing earlier: as Fujifilm indicated that X-H2S is a flagship camera model, so technically we should compare X-H2S with all other flagship models such as Canon R3, Sony A1, Nikon Z9, and OM System OM-1. What is common they all have are stacked BSI sensors. Instead, the comments suggest comparing X-H2S with A7 IV and R6, just because they are in the same price bracket. So is that a fair comparison?

Oftentimes, people might be forgotten to weigh the overall “price” to pay. Because when you are buying a camera, you are buying the ecosystem of that system which includes lenses and accessories. So depending on individual needs, the overall “price” to pay for brand “A” ecosystem might be even more expensive than that of brand “B”. So as a smart consumer/prosumer/professional, I believe one knows how to weigh it. Unless one is too loaded and spending one after another ecosystem means nothing much in his bank, I think you can ignore my statement.

I shall end here and I believe you can understand my point here. Of course, I can further make many comparisons here and there but I cannot find the justification for doing so. Like I mentioned early, there is no end in comparison. My philosophy is simple, buy an ecosystem that can make you go out and enjoy shooting with it.

All in all, I have to highlight that I am not against other camera formats. Rather this is my personal view/opinion on the term “comparision”. Again, is X-H2S priced right?

Reviews

TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 – The Fastest Lens Again

TTArtisan 50mm f0.95

Before anything else, I would like to thank TTArtisan for sending this lens for my review. I appreciate their support to make this post a reality.

Intro

While I am still waiting for the TTArtisan first-ever autofocus lens available for X-mount, TTArtisan decided to surprise everyone with the first-ever f0.95 extreme fast lens.

Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 @ 50mm . f2.8 . 1/80″ . ISO 800 . Classic Chrome
Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 @ 50mm . f2.8 . 1/160″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome

I wrote about TTArtisan 50mm f1.2 a few months back and mentioned that it was the fastest lens back then. Not anymore. It has been replaced by another newcomer from the same family and now the f0.95 is the fastest lens ever built. But how does this lens perform and how is the photo usability wide open? Let’s find out.

Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 @ 50mm . f1.4 . 1/3200″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome

Design & Build Quality

First thing you will notice the design element of this lens is adapted from the TTArtisan 23mm f1.4 and the TTArtisan 40mm f2.8 with a little twist. Some do not like the look of it, and some like the design character of it. I am the latter. This zebra-like design helps itself to get distinguished from the rest.

The aperture click is as good as the rest of the TTArtisans lenses I have used before it. The same comfortable and gentle feedback when you change the aperture values. The manual focusing ring is too provides a smooth focusing experience.

Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 @ 50mm . f2 . 1/80″ . ISO 1000 . Classic Chrome
Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 @ 50mm . f2 . 1/2900″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome

A little disappointment here, this lens does not inherit one thing from the 23mm design and it is the lens cover design. Instead of using the cap-on lens cap, it goes back to the screw-in type. Though it is still a metal one.

At 411 grams, this is probably the heaviest manual lens that I have. This is kind of expected because of the large and heavy glass elements inside the lens. In comparison, XF56mm f1.2 weights 405 grams only. Having said that, the full metal constructed lens is very well built and dense. And I am pretty sure that someone will get injured if I throw it at him.

Image Quality

At a maximum aperture of f0.95, I have a problem nailing the shots because of how shallow the depth of field is. When the focus is a hit, this lens can give a kind of soft and glowing effect which gives us a kind of dreamy feel to the photos. The result is more obvious when shooting under strong light. However, the blur-off transition from in-focus to out of focus is pretty smooth.

Left: Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 @ 50mm . f2 . 1/680″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome
Right: Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 @ 50mm . f0.95 . 1/2000″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome

In my testing period, I prefer to shoot at f2 and f2.8 as they give a good render of sharpness and contrast and they suit my own shooting preference. Of course, shooting at a lower aperture such as f5.6 gives better overall image quality which in return does not give a stronger depth of field.

Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 @ 50mm . f2 . 1/80″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome
Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 @ 50mm . f1.4 . 1/13000″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome

Both chromatic aberration and vignetting are pretty obvious especially when you are shooting at wide open. I am expecting such behaviour but nevertheless, they can be fixed in post-processing.

Focusing

Focusing is manual. But what I want to share is the experience of rotating the focus ring. It is smooth but not loose. The focus throw is 180° which gives an ample amount of “distance” for more precise focusing. TTArtsian has been maintaining this experience for their photographers since the first lens and I think this is a good one.

Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 @ 50mm . f2 . 1/1400″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome

Minimum Focus Distance (MFD)

The MFD is 50 cm and very similar to most of the lenses in this focal length. When I shoot wide open at this close, a more dreamy and softer shot as a result. In my opinion, this is even more drastic than any focus distance can achieve.

Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 @ 50mm . f0.95 . 1/200″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome

Price Point

At 218 USD, this lens is pretty close to one of their direct competitors. Is it considered expensive from your perspective? I reckon this is a reasonable price point for a manual, non-electric contact equipped extremely fast lens.

Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 @ 50mm . f2 . 1/1700″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome
Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 @ 50mm . f2 . 1/420″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome

Who is this for?

This lens is not meant for everyone. Also, compared to other TTArtsian compact manual lenses, this lens is a heavy one. It might not be as enjoyable as the others in the long run. On this account, I think it’s targeted a very specific group of photographers who understand the pro and cons of owning this unique lens and knowing what they can achieve from this lens.

If you are a newcomer to the world of manual lenses, I will recommend you try out their other lenses and if you want this focal length, there is an alternative one such as TTArtisan 50mm f1.2.

Side note

This heavy lens does not balance well with any compact X-mount cameras such as X-E series and X-A series photographers. For this reason, I do not recommend any X-E and X-A series photographer to pair with this lens because it makes the overall camera balance lead forward and hence makes your wrist more tired and it is not going to be a fun shooting experience. I will suggest including a hand grip from any sources available if you want to pair it with the lens.

Conclusion

This is my first extreme fast lens and my first ever hands-on with it. The image quality is what I have expected from this lens. While the optic quality is a little disappointing as compared to the TTArtisan 23mm f1.4, I think I can still forgive it because it gives me the thrill of shooting at an ultra-fast aperture experience.

As I mentioned earlier, I prefer the image results from f2 and f2.8, which makes me think if I ever need this lens in my arsenal. I can’t give you the right answer right now but I think it is always good to have one because you never know when you will need it someday.

Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 @ 50mm . f5.6 . 1/400″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome
Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f0.95 @ 50mm . f4 . 1/850″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome

Last by not least…

Dear TTArtisan, if you are reading this post, please give us the 32mm f2.8 autofocus lens!

Thank you for reading.

Disclaimer:
1. All the shots taken here are shot by me.
2. Some of the shots 
are slightly edited in Lightroom Classic to my preferences. Otherwise, the shots are straight out of the camera.
3. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.
4. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you like my content and you want to show some support, you can buy me a coffee here.

Reviews

Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2 – Hello To The Premium Manual Lens

Thanks to my friend Ivan Wong for giving me the opportunity to play with his latest lens, the Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2, for a week. Unfortunately due to my unforeseen workload, I only get to try this lens for 4 days before I have to return the lens to him. So this is a pretty short hands-on experience compared to the usual one.

Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2
Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2
Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2

Voigtländer has been a long time manufacturer in the market, they have been manufacturing beautifully crafted lenses for M mount, E mount, Z-mount and m43 mount. Now they have extended their portfolio to craft lenses for the X-mount. Their first lens in the X-mount portfolio is nothing but one of the popular focal lengths among the photographers, 35mm (50mm in full frame equivalent).

Design & Build Quality

We do see some manufacturers having the same lens design but different mount. However, Voigtländer completely designs a new lens design for Fujifilm X-mount. Some might say it’s a pity that it does not have similar design elements like other Voigtländer lenses or missing out on the design language that Voigtländer has. Personally, I think it is okay. After all, the design is still beautifully designed.

Fuji X-E4 . Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2 @ 35mm . f2 . 1/200″ . ISO 320 . Classic Negative

This 196 grams lens has a solid metal constructed body and I can actually feel how dense the weight of this lens is when I hold it in my hand for the first time. The aperture ring clicks give me very satisfying feedback and the manual ring rotates smoothly with a bit of friction without much force needed.

It comes with a pretty small 46mm filter size and comes with a metal screw-in hood. But I believe that, for a reason, the photographers who purchase this lens do not wish to put on the lens hood.

Fuji X-E4 . Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2 @ 35mm . f4 . 1/850″ . ISO 320 . Classic Negative

By the way, in case you wonder, the lens is not weather resistant.

Focusing

Well, unfortunately, the speed of focusing depends on the accuracy of your eyes and the speed of your fingers. Because it’s manual focusing.

Fuji X-E4 . Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2 @ 35mm . f2 . 1/160″ . ISO 400 . Classic Negative

Image Quality

At wide open, this lens gives you a kind of glowing and soft look where the blur falls off quite beautifully and is comfy to my eyes. It also provides a characteristic flare if you face the sun or strong light directly. Unfortunately, I fails to create one that is as beautiful as I saw on the web.

Fuji X-E4 . Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2 @ 35mm . f2.8 . 1/680″ . ISO 160 . Classic Negative

If you want to have a decent sharpness in the image, I recommend shooting from f2 onwards. The results are pretty good and usable at f2. Besides sharpness, contrast is decent too.

I have a high expectation (later on this) with this lens when it comes to chromatic aberration and vignetting. Luckily, I am not disappointed. They are very well controlled as I did not observe them from my shots.

Fuji X-E4 . Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2 @ 35mm . f2.8 . 1/160″ . ISO 1250 . Classic Negative

Minimum Focus Distance (MFD) 

This lens comes with a 30 cm MFD which is the same as the XF33mm f1.4 and Sigma 30mm f1.4. At this distance, you can get stronger glowing and softer results. Not forgetting that the depth of field is very shallow when you shoot wide open.

Fuji X-E4 . Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2 @ 35mm . f1.2 . 1/680″ . ISO 320 . Classic Negative

Price Point

I mentioned about me having high expectations about this lens. Allow me tell you why. According to the official suggested retail price, it costs USD 649. It is rather expensive for a manual lens. For reference, XF33mm is selling at USD 799 and Sigma 30mm f1.4 is at USD 339. If you want to justify the high price, what I can think of is the brand itself, fast aperture, compact, made in Japan and unlike other manual lens manufacturers, it does equip with electronic contact. I think it should suffice to justify, I guess?

Fuji X-E4 . Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2 @ 35mm . f2 . 1/160″ . ISO 1600 . Classic Negative

Who is this for?

If you are a photographer who wishes to gain some experience with pure manual lenses and you do not mind not knowing your aperture setting, there are many other manual lenses for your consideration. The price between Voigtländer and other manufacturers is a huge gap. From a money perspective, I personally do not recommend you to buy this lens unless you know what you are doing.

Fuji X-E4 . Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2 @ 35mm . f2 . 1/240″ . ISO 320 . Classic Negative

Assuming you want to buy this lens, but you have no idea what genres is it suitable for. I think you do not need to worry about this. Because this focal length is very versatile and it covers generally most genres such as documentary, journalism, street and portrait.

Conclusion

Thanks to the electronic contact, this lens gives me a very good manual lens experience. It allows me to know what is my aperture setting like the other autofocus lenses. But the price of this lens position itself clearly from the rest of the manual lens manufacturers. The image quality is indeed better than the other manual lens manufacturers but the result isn’t too far off by a mile.

Fuji X-E4 . Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2 @ 35mm . f2 . 1/160″ . ISO 800 . Classic Negative

Having said that, I am still glad that Voigtländer is joining the Fujifilm community and not forgetting that the 23mm f1.2 is launching soon. All in all, I hope to see more lenses from them and benefit the photographers.

Fuji X-E4 . Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2 @ 35mm . f2.8 . 1/160″ . ISO 1000 . Classic Negative
Fuji X-E4 . Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2 @ 35mm . f1.6 . 1/160″ . ISO 1600 . Classic Negative

Thank you for reading.

Disclaimer:
1. The lens is from a friend of mine and I have returned it to him by the time this article is available online.
2. Most of the shots are straight out of the camera with some shots edited via In-Camera Raw Processing
.
3. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.
4. All the shots taken here are shot by me. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you like my content and you want to show some support, you can buy me a coffee here.

Reviews

Sigma 56mm f1.4 – The Most Compact Portrait Lens

Before I start with this experience sharing post, I would like to thank and appreciate Mr Lawson from Sigma Marketing (Singapore) for providing me with the loan of Sigma 56mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN.

Sigma 56mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN
Sigma 56mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN

Intro

Fujifilm has never lacked of lens choices for portrait shooters to choose from. And there are even massive options available from the 3rd party manual lens manufacturers but not so much for autofocus lenses. I think this is the right time for Sigma to jump into the Fuji X-mount bandwagon with its trio lenses, especially the 56mm f1.4.

Sigma 56mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN
Sigma 56mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN with 2 XF 27mm f2.8 WR

56mm (85mm in 35mm format equivalent) is one of the popular focal lengths among portrait lovers. That’s because the mid-tele focal length gives good compression and shallow depth of field. But before going down further. I have to confess that I do not own the XF 56mm f1.2 or any 3rd party autofocus lenses of the same focal length. Hence, I am unable to make a good comparison between them. But what I can do is share my experience using this lens with the readers and hope the readers will have a good perspective of this lens.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f4 . 1/80″ . ISO 400. Classic Chrome

I have reviewed the Sigma 16mm f1.4 and Sigma 30mm f1.4 and now the Sigma 56mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN is on the table. This is the last piece of the trio prime lenses and let’s see how good the lens performance is.

Design & Build Quality

The lens built shared the same design elements as its brothers, giving us a low key minimalistic look. I get more enjoyment with the looks, especially the black labelled wordings on it. Similarly, this lens is also made of “Thermally Stable Composite” (TSC) polycarbonate material. Overall, it provides a very well-built lens body that is easy and lightweight to hold. Something to note, the lens does attract some fingerprints on the glossy material. Although it can be easily wiped off with a piece of cloth, it can be a little annoying and hard not to notice it.

In my opinion, when I talked about the compact lens, a reasonably small filter thread size and weight are part of the elements. This lens comes with a 55mm filter thread and weighs only 280 grams. So I think this lens qualifies as a compact lens.

Likewise, this lens is also equipped with dust and splash resistant sealing that helps to protect the lens from certain weather/environmental conditions. Last but not least, it does not come with an aperture ring either.

Image Quality

According to Sigma Marketing, each and every part of this lens was designed in 2018 (except the mount). Fast forward to 2022, how does the optical quality perform in real-world situations? If you read about how well the Sigma 30mm performed, then you can conceivably conclude that this is as good as that piece of glass or possibly even better. At wide open, the sharpness, details and contrast produced by this lens are comfortably good for my liking.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f1.4 . 1/4000″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome

I do observe some mild vignetting when I shoot at f1.4 but I think that is acceptable. If vignetting is a problem, you can either stop down to lower aperture or remove it via post-processing. As for the chromatic aberration, I do not think I observe any or I barely notice it during my tests. I think Sigma engineers are really doing a great job in this department.

For the sunny star result, the shot taken at f8 produces a softer and less rounded result. Contrastingly, the result looks sharper at f16 and more pronounced than that of f8.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f1.4 . 1/17,000″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome

For a portrait lens, what a photographer wants from a portrait lens is bokeh. Who doesn’t love beautiful bokeh? This lens probably does not produce the best bokeh but rather a pretty decent and comfortable to the eyes. Although the bokeh ball is lemon-shaped like at wide open, it does not distract me from looking at the main subject.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f8 . 1/125″ . ISO 160 . Post-edited

Focusing

Thanks to the stepping motor, the focusing experience is a great one. It is silent, fast and *accurate. I cannot hear a single motor sound produced by the stepping motor while I am focusing. Apparently, my shutter is louder.

Fuji X-E3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f1.4 . 1/11,000″ . ISO 400 . Classic Chrome

Unlike its brothers, this lens does not inherit the focusing accuracy issue. On the flip side, I do encounter some rare auto-focus hunting at times. It does not matter whether I used it during the day or night, indoor or outdoor. While I tried to replicate the focus hunting issue right from the moment I experienced it, I failed. The lens somehow just does not has this hurdle anymore.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f1.4 . 1/1800″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome
Fuji X-E3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f1.4 . 1/5000″ . ISO 400 . Classic Chrome

But do not worry about it. As I understand from Sigma Marketing, their team is constantly updating their lenses to improve the focus quality and accuracy.

Minimum Focus Distance (MFD)

This lens’ MFD is at 50cm. For a glimpse comparison, XF56mm f1.2 is 70cm, XF50mm f2 is 39cm and the XF50mm f1 is also 70cm.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f1.4 . 1/125″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome
Fuji X-E3 . Sigma 56mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f1.4 . 1/10,000″ . ISO 200 . Classic Chrome

While it is not as close as the XF50mm f2, it is definitely better than the other 2 Fuji lenses have to offer. Does MFD matter? In my case, the answer is yes. It allows me to have a shallower depth of field between the subject and the background.

Certain lenses have some level of softness when you shoot at wide-open and at MFD. Fortunately, this lens is otherwise, it is surprisingly sharp & usable. I actually like how it renders and it does not have very harsh bokeh results.

Price Point

Okay, this is “straightforward” and also “challenging” at the same time.

Let’s talk about “straightforward” first, if you are on a budget and compare it with the XF50mm f2 (*SRP SGD749, USD449). I think the Sigma 56mm (SRP SGD688, USD479) is pretty worth it. Hear me out. While you sacrifice the weather resistance that Fuji 50mm f2 offers, you have one full stop of light at your disposal. It is always an advantage when you have that extra stop of light, it will come in handy when you need it. More light is a higher priority in my case.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f8 . 1/300″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome

Here comes the challenging part, Sigma is actually priced right between another 2 third party manufacturers, Viltrox and Tokina. I believe you know which one costs higher and which one is more pocket friendly. I cannot speak on behalf of these 2 manufacturers about their portrait lenses because I did not try them out before. What I searched online is that they shared some similarities (with a little 10% difference) like weight, filter size and MFD. I think it is best for you to visit your local stores to have some hands-on experience with these 3 lenses.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f1.4 . 1/680″ . ISO 320 . Post-edited

*SRP – Suggested Retail Price

Conclusion

This is a decent portrait lens for its price and compactness. In these few weeks of hands-on, I enjoy shooting with this lens a lot. I mean, I actually used it for street photography and cityscape besides shooting portraits. It gives me a new perspective and sees things differently from my usual 23mm and 35mm focal length.

The optical quality does not tell this lens is actually designed in 2018 and the results are truly usable and sharp and contrast at wide open. In short, Sigma delivers great results in its “Contemporary” series. I am actually excited and looking forward to that one day when Sigma updates its “Contemporary” lenses and distinguishes itself among the third party manufacturers.

Who is this for?

For photographers who are just picking up and want a portrait lens with a modest budget, this might be a wise choice for you. This lens gives you an extra stop of light as compared to XF50mm f2 and is more economical than XF56mm f1.2. It really strikes a good balance in terms of price and performance while minimising the compromise that it has.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f1.4 . 1/125″ . ISO 320 . post-edited
Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f1.4 . 1/220″ . ISO 320 . Post-edited

For street photographers who love to shoot at a distance away from the subject, this is also a good choice but, of course, it does not have as much flexibility as the Sigma 30mm has.

Thank you for reading.

Disclaimer:
1. The lens is a loan unit from Mr. Lawson from Sigma Marketing (Singapore). By the time this review was online, the lens had returned back to Sigma Marketing (Singapore).

2. The lens firmware that I am using is version 1.00.
3. Some of the shots are straight out of the camera while others are edited via In-Camera Raw Processing and Adobe Lightroom Classic & Capture One.

4. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.
5. All the shots taken here are shot by me. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

http://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

http://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you like my content and you want to show some support, you can buy me a coffee here.

Reviews

Sigma 16mm f1.4 – A Good Alternative to XF16mm f1.4?

First and foremost, I would like to thank and appreciate Mr Lawson from Sigma Marketing (Singapore) for loaning me the Sigma 16mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN lens for making this review possible.

Sigma 16mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN

Intro

Similar to Sigma 30mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN, I refer to Sigma 16mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN as “Sigma 16mm f1.4” in short. Unlike the Sigma 30mm f1.4, it was announced back in October 2017 but was only available for EF-M, E-mount, L-mount and Micro Four Thirds back then. Now it is available in X-mount too.

Sigma 16mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN
Sigma 16mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN

Being a 24mm full-frame equivalent ultra-wide lens, the first thing that I can’t help noticing how huge the lens is. It is almost identical to the size of the Fuji XF16mm f1.4 and it is merely taller. Speaking of comparison, I will not compare both lenses directly as I believe every lens has its own reasons to be here and hence giving it a fair chance to shine.

Price Point

I decided to shift this section to the front because Sigma 16mm f1.4 comes at a very interesting and competitive price point. In Singapore, it is priced at SGD648/USD449 (*SRP). It is just $50 more than the XF 16mm f2.8 (SGD599/USD399 SRP) and it is far cheaper than XF 16mm f1.4 (SGD1599/USD999 SRP). With such a competitive price, are you tempted to get Sigma instead of Fuji?

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f1.4 . 1/640″ . ISO 160 . Post-edited
Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f1.4 . 1/105″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome

At this price point, lets me share with you what are the things you will be getting from this lens and what are the thing you will miss.

*SRP – Suggested Retail Price

Design & Build Quality

Sigma 16mm f1.4 has the same built element and design language as its brothers. It is a low profile lens that does not shout out loud, especially on the front glass. It is minimalistic on its own by labelling the wordings in black.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f1.4 . 1/250″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome

Although the body of the lens is made of “Thermally Stable Composite” (TSC) polycarbonate material, it feels well-constructed and comfortable to hold. But it does attract some fingerprints on the glossy material of the lens. Even so, it can be removed easily with a piece of cloth.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f5 . 1/900″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome

This huge lens weighs 405 grams and it is the heaviest one among the trio of Sigma lenses. I think there is quite a huge amount of heavy glass elements inside this lens, which explains the weighty weight. For readers who are looking to equip the lens with filters, it comes with a filter size of 67mm. It also comes with dust and splash resistant sealing that helps to protect the lens from certain conditions.

Similarly to the Sigma 30mm f1.4, it does not have an aperture ring too. So you have to control your aperture via the front dial of your camera. It’s a very similar approach to what Fujifilm has for XC lenses.

Image Quality

At f1.4, the image is usable. It retains the sharpness, contrast and details of the image very well. But for some shots especially shooting at infinity, the results tend to be soft at wide-open.

Although some vignetting can be observed, this can be easily resolved in post-processing or shot at a smaller aperture to reduce it. In my opinion, this can be forgiving and unavoidable because it is an ultra-wide lens after all.

There is also some slight chromatic aberration observed in some of my shots, but it is still within my acceptance level. Again, it can be removed easily with post-processing.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f1.4 . 1/80″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome
Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f1.4 . 1/125″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome

On the subject of the sunny star result, I prefer the shot taken at f16 as the “star” looks sharper than the one at f8. As for the lens flare, it did control very well too.

One thing to note, I never expect how good the control of the lens distortion for this ultra-wide lens. Probably thanks to the camera auto-correction? But nonetheless, the output is good.

Focusing

This lens is silent and fast. This is something that I have expected after using Sigma 30mm f1.4 as I believe they are using the same stepping motor. The sound of the focusing experience that I have is close to complete silence. Please bear in mind that this lens has lots of heavy glass inside it and yet it can achieve something like this is totally remarkable.

Regarding the focusing accuracy, unfortunately, it also inherits the same issue as the Sigma 30mm f1.4 as well. Similar off-focused results when I shoot with the little green box lit up but it hardly happens. But not too worry about it, understand from Sigma that they are constantly improving their lenses’ focusing quality and accuracy via updates.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f4 . 1/210″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome
Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f5.6 . 1/180″ . ISO 160 . Post-edited

Minimum Focus Distance (MFD)

The MFD of this lens is 25cm. By comparison, the XF16mm F1.4 is 15cm. Does it really matter? Not really matter as the general purpose of this lens is for landscape or similar genres.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f1.4 . 1/420″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome
Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f1.4 . 1/350″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome

But it does matter if the photographer could love to use the lens for other creative purposes. Because the closer the MFD you have, the more possibilities you can create with.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f1.4 . 1/2200″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome

Conclusion

Sigma 16mm f1.4 does have its shortfall but it strikes a good balance between price and overall experience. For a lens optic design that has been around for 5 years, the image renders very remarkably sharp, especially at wide open. I have to appraise that Sigma did not compromise on the image quality and I think Sigma did the right thing here as I believe this is more important than anything else for every photographer.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f1.4 . 1/450″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome
Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f1.4 . 1/250″ . ISO 400 . Classic Chrome

Overall, I can accept what this lens has to offer. Likewise, how is it compared to XF16mm f1.4? All I can say is that both lenses are good at their price points and there are reasons to be at their price points. They supply different demands to different groups of photographers. In my opinion, there is no end to making comparisons between lenses.

Who is this for?

This lens is suitable for photographers who are just starting to learn photography or tipping their toes in the world of prime lenses but with a limited budget on hand or wish to have their money well spent. But who are these photographers?

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f5.6 . 1/900″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome
Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f8 . 1/320″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome . Post-edited

Photographers who are landscape, environmental and architecture lovers, you may consider getting this lens in your arsenal. If you do not mind about its build quality, etc, the price of this lens can actually save you some money and maybe you can use that money to invest in other lenses or accessories.

For street photographers, this ultra-wide lens is harder to isolate your subject unless you get closer to it. If you know what you intend to do with this lens, otherwise I will not recommend you to use this lens.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f1.4 . 1/180″ . ISO 160 . Post-edited
Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f1.4 . 1/1000″ . ISO 160 . Post-edited

To answer my question in the title, it is indeed a good alternative to XF16mm f1.4.

Thank you for reading.

Disclaimer:
1. The lens is a loan unit from Mr. Lawson from Sigma Marketing (Singapore). By the time this review is online, the lens had returned back to Sigma Marketing (Singapore).

2. The lens firmware that I am using is version 1.00.
3. Some of the shots are straight out of the camera while others are edited via In-Camera Raw Processing and Adobe Lightroom Classic & Capture One.

4. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.
5. All the shots taken here are shot by me. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you like my content and you want to show some support, you can buy me a coffee here.

Reviews

Sigma 30mm f1.4 – Never Too Late

First of all, allow me to thank Mr Lawson from Sigma Marketing (Singapore) for loaning me the Sigma 30mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN lens for a review. I appreciate his support to make this review a reality.

Sigma 30mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN

Intro

Sigma 30mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN (I will just call it Sigma 30mm in short for the rest of the review) was announced back in February 2016. It was introduced with various mounts (i.e. EF-M, M43, E-mount and Leica L). 6 years later, X-mount is the latest mount in the Sigma family.

30mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN
30mm f1.4 Contemporary DC DN

35mm (50mm in full-frame equivalent) is a very popular focal length among all others. And then, Sigma comes with this 30mm focal length and this is an interesting focal length to compete with many 35mm lenses in the Fuji market. It also sits right between the 27mm and 33mm of what Fujifilm has offered.

At an equivalent to 45mm in full-frame, let’s dive in and see how this lens can actually perform.

Design & Build Quality

According to the official, the build of this lens is made out of a type of polycarbonate called “Thermally Stable Composite” (TSC). This material has a thermal expansion rate similar to that of aluminium and it also has a high affinity to metal parts which contributes to high-quality product manufacturing.

Fuji X-E4 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f5.6 . 1/1000″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg
Fuji X-E4 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f5.6 . 1/160″ . ISO 500 . Classic Neg

And according to my hands-on, it feels great to hold. Although it is polycarbonate built, it does not feel cheap at all. The lens is very well built and solid. But one thing to point out is that it is a fingerprint magnet and it can leave some fingerprint marks on the lens. Luckily, it can be easily wiped off.

Fuji X-E4 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f5 . 1/60″ . ISO 1250 . Classic Neg
Fuji X-E4 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f4 . 1/90″ . ISO 640 . Classic Neg

This lens comes with a filter size of 52mm and it is more than welcome for photographers to buy filters at a more affordable price.

At 275 grams, the weight of this compact lens is decently light to mount on any Fujifilm camera body without feeling adding much weight to the camera.

One fact to note is that this lens is equipped with dust and splash resistant sealing that helps to protect the lens from certain conditions.

Image Quality

Before I share my opinion about the optical quality. My understanding from Sigma Marketing is that the lens optical is exactly the same as other mounts, which also means that the glass elements and design are the same as 6 years ago.

So how does it perform in real-world situations? Well, the image quality is exceptionally good. The results at wide-open actually surprised me. The details, sharpness and contrast are well preserved.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f1.4 . 1/22000″ . ISO 320 . Classic Neg
Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f1.4 . 1/2500″ . ISO 320 . Classic Neg

As for the chromatic aberration, I hardly notice it. I think the lens did a good job of controlling it. It does help us to reduce one task in our post-processing.

For the sunny star result, the shot taken at f8 produces much softer and less rounded results. On the other hand, it looks sharper at f16 and more detailed than that of f8.

Focusing

Two words to describe it. Silent sniper. The focusing speed is surprisingly fast, accurate and completely silent. The word “completely” may sound too strong but it is really silent and the only sound I can hear is coming from my shutter. All thanks to the stepping motor that is equipped with the lens, this also means that this lens can be a wise choice for videographers to consider.

Fuji X-E4 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f4 . 1/160″ . ISO 500 . Classic Neg

As for accuracy, I can say it has a very high accuracy rate, probably around 95%. Why not 100%? Because I do encounter a few off-focused results when the little green box has lit up. For under low light situations, this lens still performs well most of the time.

Something to highlight, when I am trying to do some closed up shots under broad daylight, I encountered this phenomenon where the subject is not in focus but the little green box has lit up. What I do is focus on another nearby object and then it works as per normal.

But rest assure, Sigma is constantly updating their lenses to improve the focus quality and accuracy. In fact, there is an update for this lens last Friday. Unfortunately, I do not have the chance to give it a try.

Minimum Focus Distance (MFD)

The MFD is at 30cm which is considered quite close but not extremely close. One thing to note is that shooting at MFD produces a very special character to the photo. Shooting under sunlight, the focused object looks sharp but anything around it is kind of soft and the softness will slowly blend into the background as the distance is further from the object. Somehow, I quite like how it renders.

Fuji X-E4 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f1.4 . 1/1900″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg
Fuji X-E4 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f1.4 . 1/1000″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Also, if you are shooting wide-open at the MFD, it produces a very shallow depth of field.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f1.4 . 1/3800″ . ISO 160 . Post-edited
Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f2 . 1/2400″ . ISO 160 . Post-edited

Price Point

I rarely open up discussions about price points. But this lens is really positioned itself very well. At *SGD488 (or USD339), it is slightly above as XC35mm f2 at SGD299 (or USD 199) and way below XF35mm f2 at SGD699 (or USD 399). Yet it offers one full stop more light.

Fuji X-E4 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f1.4 . 1/60″ . ISO 500 . Classic Neg
Fuji X-E4 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f1.4 . 1/60″ . ISO 400 . Classic Neg

With this price point, it does attract a lot of potential buyers who are about to start their photography journey.

*The price quoted is based on Recommended Retail Price.

Conclusion

Coming from a guy who likes to shoot streets with 23mm and 35mm focal lengths, I am able to adapt the Sigma 30mm f1.4 very well. In these 2 weeks of loan, I do not find much of a challenge using this lens except for the above-mentioned issue.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f1.4 . 1/2700″ . ISO 160 . Post-edited

For a slightly over a demi-decade old glass design, the photos taken with this lens are considered impressive and pretty usable, especially for the wide-open shots.

However, this lens does come with some downsides. First, it does not has an aperture ring. Something that I do miss sometimes. Second, it is not a full weather resistant lens. It does not matter to me but I think it is good to let the readers know.

Overall, I think this piece of glass does strike a good balance between price, image quality and the tradeoffs. Plus, it is made in Japan.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f1.4 . 1/5000″ . ISO 160 . Post-edited

Who is this for?

This focal length covers well in most genres such as street, journalism, portraits and landscape. Hence I will highly recommend it to an amateur who just picking up photography and trying to explore the world with prime lenses; someone who does not has a 35mm focal length; and someone who is on a tight budget.

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f2.2 . 1/170″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome
Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f1.4 . 1/280″ . ISO 600 . Classic Chrome
Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f1.4 . 1/2000″ . ISO 160 . Post-edited

Thank you for reading.

Disclaimer:
1. The lens is a loan unit from Mr. Lawson from Sigma Marketing (Singapore). By the time this review is online, the lens had returned back to Sigma Marketing (Singapore).

2. The lens firmware that I am using is version 0.63.
3. Some of the shots are straight out of the camera while others are edited via In-Camera Raw Processing and Adobe Lightroom Classic.

4. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.
5. All the shots taken here are shot by me. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you like my content and you want to show some support, you can buy me a coffee here.

Discussion

X-E4: Minimalism = Limitation?

Fuji X-E4 . XF27mm f2.8 WR

Is minimalism equal to limitation? In a way, yes. Minimalism is by keeping things as simple as possible, limited yet still functioning as what it suppose to be. In this case, X-E4 has done it and did it right. It has the most minimalistic design Fujifilm has ever created. The design is a bold move. Fujifilm removes some of the hardware functions but still allows photographers to access them when needed via the “Q” menu, setting up the “My Menu” or mapping it to other buttons or dials. While I am not sure by removing the grip from the camera body is a wise choice but honestly speaking, the camera is aesthetically beautiful.

Fuji X-E4 . XF27mm f2.8 WR
Fuji X-E4 . XF27mm f2.8 WR

X-E4 is not designed in such a way that it will please everyone but rather, it does attract a niche group of people who adore simplicity. In other words, this camera is what represents the life of how the photographer live in. At least I am.

Fuji X-E4 . XF27mm f2.8 WR

A little bit of history here. X-E4 was announced on 27 January 2021 and released a month later. And my first ever review post was actually about this camera together with the XF27mm f2.8. (The review can be found here.)

I love all the camera designs from Fujifilm, especially the X-Pro series but the X-E series still has a special place in my heart. I cannot explain specifically why I love this series so much. But I think a combination of aesthetic, compact and retro-style designs are probably the reasons.

Fuji X-E4 . XF27mm f2.8 WR

Another short history here. I pick up my first X-E series (X-E3) back in 2019. It is a preloved unit but the overall condition is not heavily abused. It’s a simple camera that somehow I love using for my street shutter therapy more than my X-T3. It’s light, compact and less prominent among other camera designs. It does not look like a professional camera but in its gut, it is capable to meet my needs. X-E4, in my opinion, improves way better than its predecessor in many ways.

Back to X-E4. So how do I overcome the limitations of this camera? Well, I just simply preset the desired ISO auto setting (maximum ISO sensitivity and minimum shutter speed) and that’s all. Most of the functions that I need is actually available in the “Q” menu. Honestly, I rarely touch anything else besides the aperture value, exposure compensation value and of course the shutter button.

So who is this camera suitable for?

Besides people who love simplicity, in my opinion, this camera is very suitable for someone who is a retro-style enthusiastic, an everyday camera for casual photographers and of course a good pickup camera for amateurs. Why so? Firstly, it is not as expensive as its other brothers (i.e. X-Pro and X-T series). Secondly, it is equipped with the X-Trans IV sensor, which is a very capable sensor and also not forgetting that this sensor is also equipped in all its other brothers as well. Thirdly, it has a lot of compact lenses to pair up with (both Fujifilm and third parties manual lenses).

To end this, I have been using this camera for months. In these few months of using it, I get to understand what this camera design philosophy is. In my interpretation, the answer is very straightforward. Fujifilm wants to let the photographer concentrate on shooting, enjoy the process of shooting and leave everything else to the camera to handle it. I am glad that Fujifilm dares to design something different from its current line-up of cameras. And I hope this X-E4 will encourage more photographers to bring it out and capture the moments in them. After all, it’s a beauty to hang out with.

Fuji X-E4 . XF33mm f1.4
Fuji X-E4 . XF27mm f2.8

Disclaimer:
1. The camera is a loan unit from Mr. Keitaro So, Divisional Head of Fujifilm Asia Pacific. By the time this review is online, the units had returned back to Fujifilm Asia Pacific.

2. All the shots taken here are shot by me.
3. Some of the shots
 are straight out of the camera while others are edited via In-Camera Raw Processing and Adobe Lightroom Classic.
4. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.
5. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.

Thank you for reading.

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you like my content and you want to show some support, you can buy me a coffee here.

Discussion

XF23mm f1.4 R – is the Classic still worth buying in 2022?

After three months of delay, the successor of the classic XF23mm f1.4 R has finally arrived on our shore this month. While the price of the newly launched lens is priced at USD 900, the predecessor is easily available between USD 600 to 700~ ish. Is it worth saving the $200 ~ $300 difference? In this post, I will share some of the experiences I had with both lenses and hope to help you in your own decision journey.

XF23mm f1.4 R
XF23mm f1.4 R
XF23mm f1.4 R

Before I start my sharing, I would like to thank Ivan Joshua Loh for lending me his XF23mm f1.4 R for a shoot. This has actually landed me an opportunity to have a full 2 days of hands-on with the classic lens.

Image Quality

The classic one gives an overall decent image quality all most focusing distance but I noticed soft results at its minimum focus distance. Chromatic aberration is also quite noticeable, especially in an outdoor sunny environment and shooting wide open. As for the new one, it produces sharper image quality and addresses those flaws that I mentioned earlier. The rendering of the bokeh also seems to be better than the classic one. More pleasant to the eyes if you ask me.

For the new F23mm f1.4 R LM WR, you can have a look at photos taken here and here.

Autofocus speed

This is a very subjective topic when comes to focusing performance. How fast or slow depends on how the individual defines it. Unfortunately, I have both the classic and new lenses mounted on different camera bodies (due to different loan periods) but the cameras are equipped with X-Trans 4 (if that is the concern). For reference, X-E4 is for the classic lens and X-S10 is for the new lens.

To my surprise, the classic one is not that slow with the newer camera. The focusing speed is acceptably fast and I do not really experience any slow-focusing or focus hunting under dim light conditions. However, it is surely noisy.

For the new lens, the focusing speed is indeed very fast and silent. It locks onto the subject really quick and precise.

Minimum Focus Distance

If you are like me who like to take as close up as possible, the classic is not for you. It’s minimum focus distance is at 28 cm as compared to 19cm on the new one.

Size and Weight

To be honest, they are somewhat close to each other. The overall size and weight is nothing much to shout about or compare. While one is slightly wider and shorter, the other is slightly taller and slimmer. Both are about the same weight and still bigger than the f2 variant.

Appearance

The classic one comes with the push/pull clutch manual focus ring. The aperture ring is close to clickless. Overall, the lens gives a very vintage style design element.

As for the new one, it is totally the opposite of the classic. Fujifilm has removed the push/pull clutch, gives the aperture ring better clicky feedback and modernize the overall lens design. Plus it includes the Weather Resistant (WR).

Conclusion

The successor iso truly the winner here. I can see how much effort Fujifilm has improved the lens in almost every aspect of the classic one.

Back to the question. Is it worth saving the $200 ~ $300 difference? Ideally, getting the latest glass is always the better choice. If you have no financial constraints, this is the way to go.

X-E4 . XF23mm f1.4 R @ F5.6

But if you are just picking up photography with a limited budget, I think there are a few more options besides getting the used XF23mm f1.4 R. I think starting off with 3rd party lenses from Sigma and Viltrox is also another good option (if you are willing to accept their strengths and drawbacks).

X-E4 . XF23mm f1.4 R @ F1.4

What is your opinion? Share with me in the comment below or DM me in instagrams. Cheers!

As for me, I have a lot of concerns when purchasing a used lens and that’s just my two cents. I am kind of biased to the successor and that’s because I started using the successor before using the classic lens. On that account, I have unconsciously set a high standard for image quality and I cannot turn it back. Yes, it is not a cheap lens but it is unarguably a futureproofing lens for the newer camera bodies which will harness the power of the lens.

X-E4 . XF23mm f1.4 R @ F1.4

Disclaimer:
1. All the shots taken here are shot by me.
2. Some of the shots
 are straight out of the camera while others are edited via In-Camera Raw Processing and Adobe Lightroom Classic.
3. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.
4. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.

Thank you for reading.

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you like my content and you want to show some support, you can buy me a coffee here.