Reviews

XF56mm f1.2 WR – Almost There. Almost Perfect

TLDR

This is one of Fujifilm’s finest and best optical lenses that Fuji fanboys and fangirls should consider owning. Especially if you do not own any portrait lenses and plan to get one, you may consider this gem. I know it’s not a cheap lens, so save up the money and aim for this one. You will fall in love with it.

Intro

XF56mm f1.2 WR is one of the most anticipated lenses ever released. When it was announced at the X Summit NYC back in September 2022 together with the X-H2, I think I can hear many fans (including myself) of this 85mm (full frame equivalent) screaming to get one.

But lady luck is not with me. Somehow I did not manage to get one since it launched. It took me longer than expected and together with the help of my friend to get one.

Design and Build Quality

It comes with Fujifilm well-built, well-constructed, and well-weight lens. At 445 grams, it is actually not as heavy as it sounds. Fujifilm keeps the best clicky aperture ring and smooth manual focus ring (focus-by-wire) experience. They are still as satisfying as the other FujiFilm lenses.

Fuji X-T5 . XF56mm f1.2 @ 56mm . f1.2 . 1/125″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

They also include the auto-aperture lock button too, which I think is pretty standard for Fujifilm’s new-generation lenses. Similarly, Fujifilm includes a plastic hood instead of a metal hood (like the good old days).

Fuji X-T5 . XF56mm f1.2 @ 56mm . f1.2 . 1/80″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

As the name suggested, it comes with weather resistance too. As I mentioned in another post, this is something a pro lens should have nowadays.

Fuji X-T5 . XF56mm f1.2 @ 56mm . f1.2 . 1/30″ . ISO 320 . Nostalgic Negative

The filter size is 67mm. This is considered a decent size for a mid-telephoto lens (and not too painful for photographers spending on filters).

Image Quality

What can I complain about this lens’ image quality? At wide-open, it is undeniable the clinically sharp image quality I have ever seen among the Fujifilm lenses (but personal opinion, XF80mm f2.8 is still the sharpest lens). I seldom use this word to express the image quality but it is definitely breathtaking.

Fuji X-T5 . XF56mm f1.2 @ 56mm . f1.2 . 1/900″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

As for the background blur, I love how beautiful the fall-off between the focused subject and the other is. Unlikely some other lenses from third-party manufacturers where the bokeh are hard and harsh, the bokeh from this lens is rendered very smoothly and very pleasing to my eyes.

Fuji X-T5 . XF56mm f1.2 @ 56mm . f1.2 . 1/80″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

Speaking of chromatic aberration, there is no purple fringing to be seen. Again, this is a benchmark from Fujifilm. But for vignetting, there is a tiny vignetting at the corners at wide open. This is very impressive for an f1.2 lens. Of course, you can either remove the vignetting in post-edit or step up the aperture value.

The lens/focus breathing is good here. The focus distance did not change dramatically as you change the focus distance between the Minimum Focus Distance and infinity and vice versa. But I cannot say this lens will be a great lens for videographers (I will share more later).

Focusing

It may not be the fastest from Fujifilm but it is a quiet one. It focuses fast if the subject is slightly off-focus and under well-lit conditions. Otherwise, the lens might give some wobbly focusing experience and might take quite a while to focus lock onto the subject. I do experience being unable to focus on the subject and that is mainly under extremely low light or challenging conditions.

Fuji X-T5 . XF56mm f1.2 @ 56mm . f1.2 . 1/280″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

If you are wondering how much better is the new one and the original XF56mm f1.2, I tested with the original one before and I can say that the newer one does focus much better and faster.

What contributes to the “not the fastest” focusing lens? I guess that it is missing the Linear Motor (LM) (as the name of the lens missing out the LM, suggested that there is no LM) which is designed to drive the focus lens group faster and quieter.

According to Fujifilm, they use the DC motor.

Minimum Focus Distance (MFD)

The MFD is 50cm, which is remarkably short for a mid-telephoto lens and also a huge improvement from the original XF56mm f1.2 at 70cm.

Fuji X-T5 . XF56mm f1.2 @ 56mm . f1.2 . 1/80″ . ISO 400 . Nostalgic Negative

The image quality taken at MFD is very impressive too. Some lenses do have some characteristics shown up at MFD such as a soft glowing effect and this lens does not have any.

Price Point

At 999 USD, it is definitely not the cheapest portrait lens out there in the market and the price of this lens set it far apart from its peers and competitors.

Fuji X-T5 . XF56mm f1.2 @ 56mm . f11 . 1/125″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative
Fuji X-T5 . XF56mm f1.2 @ 56mm . f11 . 1/125″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

Who are the competitors? We have Viltrox 75mm f1.2 in the market at almost half the price of the XF56mm f1.2 WR and Viltrox 56mm f1.4 at 299 USD. Not forgetting that we also have the Sigma 56mm f1.4 and the original XF56mm f1.2 is priced just a little more than the Viltrox.

Others

I kind of dislike the plastic hood it provided. When I keep the lens hood facing inwards, it blocks the aperture ring and I am unable to control it. So some possible solutions will be:

Fuji X-T5 . XF56mm f1.2 @ 56mm . f1.2 . 1/500″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative
  1. Mount the lens hood facing outwards;
  2. Remove the hood completely / not mounting the lens hood at all;
  3. Set to Automatic Aperture control and then control via the front command dial to get my shots.

Don’t get me wrong, I always do mount the lens hood facing outwards for long-duration shots. I just find it cumbersome if I want to do some quick snapshots.

Who is this for?

Putting the price aside, this lens is easily my recommendation for professional portrait photographers. But as for street photographers, journalists, and documentary photographers, I will leave it to you for your consideration. The focal length might be too tight for some to get used to but it is a good focal length to complement other focal lengths such as 28mm/35mm (in full frame equivalent). Be it with your primary camera or dual camera setup.

Fuji X-T5 . XF56mm f1.2 @ 56mm . f1.2 . 1/150″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

As for videographers, I think it is a great lens to use if you need the wide-open f1.2 aperture for your work. Also, the autofocus sometimes does have some jerking, so probably need to manually focus it or alternative external controls.

Fuji X-T5 . XF56mm f1.2 @ 56mm . f1.2 . 1/80″ . ISO 200 . Nostalgic Negative

Conclusion

As my title said, this successor is almost perfect. What is the missing piece? For me, everything is perfect, the lens size, the weight, and the superior image quality. Only if Fujifilm could introduces the LM instead of using the DC motor, it will be a perfect lens. Of course, there might be many factors or reasons that stop them from using LM.

Fuji X-T5 . XF56mm f1.2 @ 56mm . f1.2 . 1/250″ . ISO 500 . Nostalgic Negative

Thank you for reading.

Disclaimer:
1. All the shots taken here are shot by me.
2. Most of the shots are straight out of the camera with some shots edited via In-Camera Raw Processing or Capture One.

3. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.
4. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you have a Facebook account, feel free to join Fujifanboys FB group.

If you like my content and you want to show some support and keep this blog alive, you can buy me a coffee here.

Event

My Favorite Photos in 2022

The year 2022 was another fruitful year for me. Of the 28 posts I have posted this year, 21 are reviews of camera gears and lenses. I also had a small achievement by getting 100k views on this blog this year (A big thank you, everyone!). It is challenging to juggle my job, photo shoots, and family time but I am glad I have made it and I enjoy the process.

Again, I would like to thank Carmen, Marketing Manager of Fujifilm Singapore, Cles Distribution of Tamron, Mr. Lawson from Sigma Marketing (Singapore), TTArtisan, Laowa, and FunLeader for giving me the opportunity to be able to hands-on with the gears and lenses, otherwise, this would not even happen.

I am happy to see more X-mount lenses released this year. Especially this year, Fuji has gained a lot of support from the 3rd party manufacturers and of course, I am referring to the autofocus lenses. While we have no idea what Fujifilm going to release next year but I hope to have an exciting one (I pray for X-Pro 4 and X100V successor arrival). And I also hope to see more autofocus lenses from 3rd party manufacturers to be released next year.

Okay, back to the topic. This is a little different from last year. I decided just to share what are my favorite photos taken this year (because it is hard to filter just 12 photos) and I also split them into 2 categories: “The street” & “The portrait”. Please enjoy.

The street:

#1

Fuji X-S10 . XF 23mm f1.4 WR @ 23mm . f1.4 . 1/26000″ . ISO 320 . Classic Neg

#2

Fuji X-E4 . XF 23mm f1.4 R @ 23mm . f1.4 . 1/180″ . ISO 1250 . Classic Neg

#3

Fuji X-E4 . XF 33mm f1.4 WR @ 33mm . f1.4 . 1/7000″ . ISO 320 . Classic Neg

#4

Fuji X-E4 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f5.6 . 1/160″ . ISO 500 . Classic Neg

#5

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f1.4 . 1/640″ . ISO 160 . Post-edited

#6

Fuji X-E4 . XF 27mm f2.8 WR @ 27mm . f5.6 . 1/480″ . ISO 320 . Classic Neg

#7

Fuji X-E3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f1.4 . 1/11,000″ . ISO 400 . Classic Chrome

#8

 Fuji X-E3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f1.4 . 1/9000″ . ISO 400 . Classic Chrome

#9

Fuji X-E4 . Voigtländer Nokton 35mm f1.2 @ 35mm . f2.8 . 1/680″ . ISO 160 . Classic Negative

#10

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/800″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

#11

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/300″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

#12

Fuji X-H2S . XF27mm f2.8 WR @ 27mm . f2.8 . 1/5400″ . ISO 160 . Nostalgic Negative

#13

Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 50mm f2 @ 50mm . f2 . 1/1500″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome .

#14

Fuji X-T3 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/680″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome

#15

Fuji X-H2 . XF23mm f1.4 WR @ 23mm . f5 . 2″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative . 65:24 crop

#16

Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 25mm f2 @ 25mm . f2 . 1/100″ . ISO 320 . Acros

#17

Fuji X-T3 . TTArtisan 25mm f2 @ 25mm . f5.6 . 1/3200″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome

#18

Fuji X-T5 . XF50mm f2 WR @ 50mm . f3.2 . 1/80″ . ISO 1250 . Nostalgic Negative

#19

Fuji X-T5 . XF23mm f1.4 WR @ 23mm . f1.4 . 1/45″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

#20

Fuji X-E4. XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f2.8 . 1/80″ . ISO 400 . Classic Negative

#21

Fuji X-E4. XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f2.8 . 1/80″ . ISO 1000 . Classic Negative

The portrait:

#1

Fuji X-T3 . XF 23mm f1.4 WR @ 23mm . f1.4 . 1/9000″ . ISO 160 . Post-edit

#2

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 30mm f1.4 @ 30mm . f1.4 . 1/5000″ . ISO 160 . Post-edited

#3

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f8 . 1/125″ . ISO 160 . Post-edited

#4

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f1.4 . 1/220″ . ISO 320 . Post-edited

#5

Fuji X-T3 . Sigma 56 mm f1.4 @ 56mm . f1.4 . 1/125″ . ISO 2000 . Post-edited

#6

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 98.8mm . f4 . 1/240″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

#7

Fuji X-T3 . Tamron 17-70mm @ 35mm . f2.8 . 1/105″ . ISO 320 . Classic Chrome

#8

Fuji X-T3 . Tamron 17-70mm @ 54.7mm . f4.5 . 1/80″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome

#9

Fuji X-T3 . Tamron 17-70mm @ 17mm . f4 . 1/640″ . ISO 160 . Classic Chrome

#10

Fuji X-H2S . XF80mm f2.8 @ 80mm . f2.8 . 1/680″ . ISO 320 . Nostalgic Negative

#11

Fuji X-H2 . XF50mm f1 WR @ 50mm . f2 . 1/220″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

#12

Fuji X-H2 . XF50mm f1 WR @ 50mm . f1.8 . 1/120″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

#13

Fuji X-Pro 3 . TTArtisan 25mm f2 @ 25mm . f2 . 1/500″ . ISO 160 . Classic Negative

#14

Fuji X-Pro 3 . TTArtisan 25mm f2 @ 25mm . f2 . 1/1600″ . ISO 160 . Classic Negative

#15

Fuji X-T5 . XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f2.8 . 1/60″ . ISO 3200 . Nostalgic Negative

#16

The last one that I did not post in any of my blogs at all.

Fuji X-H2 . XF50mm f1 @ 50mm . f1.8 . 1/110″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

Thank you for reading (browsing).

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you have a Facebook account, feel free to join Fujifanboys FB group.

If you like my content and you want to show some support and keep this blog alive, you can buy me a coffee here.

Reviews

XF30mm f2.8 – Fuji’s Smallest Macro Lens

XF30mm f2.8 R LM WR macro, I will call it XF30mm f2.8 here, was first teased in Fujifilm X Summit Omiya 2022 and then finally announced together with X-T5 on the Fujifilm X Summit Tokyo 2022. This lens also marked the “last of 10th anniversary of X mount” released in 2022.

Before I share further, I would like to thank Ms. Carmen, Marketing Manager of Fujifilm Singapore, for arranging and loaning the XF30mm f2.8 and X-E4 for this review. By the time this post was online, both the lens and camera unit had returned back to Fujifilm Singapore. Also, in this experience sharing, I tested with my X-T5 as well.

Intro

XF30mm f2.8 is the latest and the third macro lens in the Fujifilm lineup. At 45mm in full-frame equivalent, this focal length is unique for a life-size macro photography lens. That’s because typically when we think about macro lenses, they are usually about 100mm-ish focal length and shoot from a mid-range distance. Although there are manufacturers that create similar focal lengths to XF30mm, this is Fujifilm’s first of its kind.

Fuji X-E4. XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f2.8 . 1/400″ . ISO 160 . Classic Negative

Design and Build Quality

First things first, the design element of this lens resembles much like the XF50mm f2. From afar, I am sure not everyone can tell the difference between the two (unless using a silver XF50mm f2). If you take a closer look, the XF30mm is a tad taller but it comes with a smaller filter thread at 43mm as compared to 46mm on the XF50mm f2.

Fuji X-E4. XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f2.8 . 1/80″ . ISO 1000 . Classic Negative

Among its macro siblings, it is the lightest. Weighing 195 grams against XF60mm 2.4 at 215 grams and XF80mm f2.8 at 750 grams. It is also the smallest (smaller than XF60mm by a bit).

Fuji X-T5. XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f2.8 . 1/90″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

The aperture ring is as clicky as most of the Fuji lenses out there. It comes with an A (Auto) Position Lock too if you prefer to have aperture control via the front command dial.

Fuji X-E4. XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f2.8 . 1/80″ . ISO 200 . Classic Negative

Image Quality

At wide open, the image quality from this lens is super sharp with great contrast. Even when shooting so close to the subject, the sharpness remains great and the details are well-preserved. I think “clinical sharp” is the best word to describe the optic of this lens.

Unlike harsh and messy bokeh in some lenses, I do love and appreciate how the glass renders beautifully with the fall-off being seamless. Also, I think this is an expectation from Fuji-designed lenses but I do not observe any chromatic aberration or vignetting in the photos.

Fuji X-T5. XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f2.8 . 1/80″ . ISO 160 . Nostalgic Negative

As for sunny star, this lens doesn’t seem to give a sharp one, even at its smallest aperture. But this is not important in my opinion because what’s important is its macro capability, right?

Focusing

I will split it into two parts to discuss this.

In the first part, its focus locked really quickly for the usual applications. Very similar to the new generation lens such as XF23mm f1.4 WR, etc, it just snaps onto the subject real quick. In this portion, I have no problem focusing both day and night. As for the cameras I have tested, it focuses fast on an X-E4 but it focuses even faster on the X-T5, which shows the power of the new X-Trans sensor and processor.

Fuji X-E4. XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f8 . 1/80″ . ISO 320 . Classic Negative

The second part, it has the typical macro lens characteristics when I shoot really close to the subject and under low light situations. I experienced a slight focus throw to infinity and back slowly before it locked to the subject. If you know how to recover from this situation quickly, then it will be fine.

Fuji X-E4. XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f2.8 . 1/4700″ . ISO 160 . Nostalgic Negative

Minimum Focus Distance

The Minimum Focus Distance is only 10cm from the sensor, the shortest among all the Fujifilm lenses and that includes the macro lenses (XF64mm f2.4 is 26cm and XF80mm f2.8 is 25cm). It can shoot very close to the subject if you wonder. So close to the extent that the lens hood is in its way if you mount the lens hood for protection, etc.

Fuji X-E4. XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f2.8 . 1/80″ . ISO 400 . Classic Negative
Fuji X-E4. XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f2.8 . 1/80″ . ISO 320 . Classic Negative

Price Point

Surprisingly, this is the cheapest macro lens among the 3 Fujifilm macro lenses. At 599 USD, it is merely 50 USD cheaper than the XF60mm f2.4 (the first-ever macro lens from Fujifilm).

Fuji X-E4. XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f2.8 . 1/80″ . ISO 160 . Classic Negative

Who is this for?

This might be a good choice if you are a new photographer or looking for your first prime lens. It has a sweet focal length suitable for genres like street, documentary, journalism, portraits, animal portrait, cityscape, and landscape and also steps into the world of macro like insects, products, etc.

Fuji X-T5. XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f2.8 . 1/80″ . ISO 2000 . Nostalgic Negative
Fuji X-T5. XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f2.8 . 1/850″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

Conclusion

I love shooting with my XF80mm f2.8 especially when I shoot for products and portraits. That’s simply because of the sharpness and details that only a macro lens can deliver but it is not a cheap one and it is not the lightest prime lens.

Back to this lens, you do not need to be a macro lover to like this lens. Its MOD basically allows you to take a closer shot of your subject without worrying about having off-focus shots. It also has a focal length close to the “standard” prime lens. This brings out even more versatility in using this lens.

Last but not least, it is compact, and lightweight which makes it a great choice to bring out easily without burdening your shoulder.

Fuji X-T5. XF30mm f2.8 @ 30mm . f5.6 . 1/1300″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

In short, the XF30mm f2.8 is not the brightest prime lens among the Fuji lenses, but it is one of the most well-balanced and versatile lenses on the market.

Disclaimer:
1. All the shots taken here are shot by me.
2. Most of the shots are straight out of the camera with some shots edited via In-Camera Raw Processing.

3. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.
4. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you have a Facebook account, feel free to join Fujifanboys FB group.

If you like my content and you want to show some support and keep this blog alive, you can buy me a coffee here.

Discussion

XF18-120mm – Meet The “Worst” Lens of 2022

If you are aware, DPReview TV has done it again. Yes, this is the second time DPReview commented that the Fujifilm XF lens is not sharp, and unfortunately, XF18-120mm f4 is that lens. The first one was back in 2020 and they commented that the XF50mm f1 was soft.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/480″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg
Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/950″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

In DPReview TV, they have this culture in which they will share their thoughts on the best and worse cameras and lenses at the end of every year with some alcohol.

So what are the comments? While Chris mentioned that it is a decent lens, Jordan was disappointed with the lens as it is not sharp and it should be sharper to take full advantage of the X-H2’s 8K video recording capability or the X-H2S’ 6.2k open gate.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 43.2mm . f4 . 1/1600″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg
Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 45.4mm . f4 . 1/420″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

This sparks quite a lot of discussions in various forums. Some videographers are worried & wonder why, some are outraged, and some simply ignore it. Usually, I belong to the last category. But I have a few friends who actually want to buy this lens and they want to use it for photography purposes. So I just hope to address some concerns with this post.

The first thing about this lens is that it is designed with videography and videographers in mind. As suggested by many videographers out there, videography lenses that are optimized for video are often not sharp. Even if it is a sharp lens, videographers will need to do something to soften the sharpness. What fascinates me is that the “worse lens” comment actually came out from Jordon and he is a videographer shouldn’t he know why the lens is not sharp-sharp?

I shall stop talking about videography (because I am no expert) and share from my photography standpoint. I do not own this XF18-120mm but I do test the lens out and used it for slightly over 2 weeks. Deep in my heart, it is a very good general-purpose lens with decently sharp across all focal lengths and with adequate contrast. Among all the non-red badged lenses, It is probably one of the best zoom lenses coming out from Fujifilm. Very good control of chromatic aberration and vignetting is an additional plus point to the lens.

If you are looking for an all-rounder lens and you do not mind having a power-zoom lens like this one (it has 3 ways of zoom functionalities) and missing out on the slightly wider focal length like 16mm, I strongly recommend you to try it out in your local camera stores for your consideration.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/640″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

But then again, sometimes you need to take their comments with a pinch of salt. After all, they are kinda drunk in the show.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 108.9mm . f5.6 . 1/350″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Thank you for reading.

Disclaimer:
1. All the shots taken here are shot by me.
2. Most of the shots are straight out of the camera with some shots edited via In-Camera Raw Processing.

3. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.
4. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you have a Facebook account, feel free to join Fujifanboys FB group.

If you like my content and you want to show some support and keep this blog alive, you can buy me a coffee here.

Reviews

Fujifilm X-T5 – Photography First Again

My most anticipated camera is finally here. I skipped X-T4 not because it is not a worthy camera to upgrade. An improved battery and In-Body Image Stabilization are most welcome. But something I am unexpected back then is that it came with a fold-out fully articulated screen. Partly because I love how the 3-way tilting screen works for me and if I used a similar screen configuration like the X-T4 and X-S10, I have some parallax error when I fold out the screen for low-angle shots. Nevertheless, at that point in time, the choice of having an articulated screen is the best option as the X-T4 was positioned as a hybrid flagship camera.

Now, X-T4 has 2 indirect successors, X-H2S and X-H2. They are the new generation hybrid flagship cameras in the Fujifilm line-up. Now it is time for Fujifilm to give us photographers a photography-centric camera and that’s true. During the X Summit Tokyo 2022, Yuji Igarashi san mentioned “FujiFilm will never forget photograph, which means, we will never forget its photographic cameras.” This is where I think Fujifilm is clear and remain committed to photographers like us and of course, hearing our voices and caring about our feedback.

Before I continue further, I would like to thank Ms. Carmen, Marketing Manager of Fujifilm Singapore, for arranging and loaning the X-T5 for review. By the time this post is online, the camera unit had returned back to Fujifilm Singapore.

Design, Build Quality, Handling & The Shutter…

X-T5, in general, maintains the same good retrospective design. It obtains many similarities to X-T2/T3 such as a 3-way tilting LCD screen and compact size (actually a tad smaller). Not only that, but it also takes something good (and bad) from the X-T4 too.

The camera still has the same magnesium alloy build quality as its predecessors. Fantastic build quality. Nothing bad to comment on this department.

Fuji X-T5 . XF23mm f1.4 WR @ 23mm . f5.6 . 1/750″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

Dials, dials, and dials. This should be one of the many reasons why we love Fuji. And the dials aren’t disappointing us. They are good to turn and give one of the best tactile feedbacks thus far. But there is one dial that I am not sure fits the “Photography first” philosophy and that is the “Still/Movie mode dial”. How I wish that X-T5 has the same “Metering” dial placement as the X-T3 instead of the “Still/Movie mode dial” found in the X-T4. But I guess, one needs to know how to be contented. (Metering mode can be accessed via the “Up” selector button.)

With the redesign of the camera grip, it now feels better to hold than the X-T3. But if you have big hands like me, I will suggest you get a handgrip to have that extra confidence to hold the camera.

The shutter seems to take from X-T4. It has very similar gentle and satisfying mechanical shutter feedback as the X-T4 and I quite like it.

The weight of the X-T5 is slightly heavier than X-T3, 557 grams against 539 grams (both with battery). In practice, it is hard to tell which one is heavier with them holding onto your hand. But definitely lighter than X-T4’s 607 grams.

Fuji X-T5 . XF35mm f1.4 @ 35mm . f5.6 . 1/2000″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

Sensor and Processor

Since X-T5 inherits almost everything internally from X-H2, I will not discuss much over here. It comes with the X-Trans CMOS sensor 5 HR and the X-Processor 5. In short, the photography performance is identical during my test (except for the videography).

Fuji X-T5 . XF35mm f1.4 @ 35mm . f1.4 . 1/400″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

That also means it also includes the new base ISO 125 and the new maximum electronic shutter speed of 1/180,000 seconds.

Image Quality

Since it has the same sensor and processor so everything should be the same, right? In my opinion, yes. Or at least I do not see anything different. One word: awesome!

Performance

Based on my camera usage, I feel that the autofocus performance is (almost) no different from the X-H2. Of course, it is also depending on which lenses you are using. Combining X-T5 with newer lenses makes the overall experience snappier, locking onto the subject faster and more accurately. While the older lenses (particularly without Linear Motor), are slower but are still not far off too.

Fuji X-T5 . XF35mm f1.4 @ 35mm . f2 . 1/80″ . ISO 640 . Nostalgic Negative

How about comparing both X-T3 and X-T5? In my opinion, you can really feel the difference in AF performance and accuracy rate between both of them, regardless of the newer or old lenses.

IBIS

X-T5 can also achieve up to 7 stops compensation with some lenses up to 5 stops. Yes, the same as X-H2 and X-H2S. So technically I should be able to obtain a good 1/2-second result like the one I did in X-H2 and X-H2S. Well, close enough. I manage to get a 1-second hand-held shot.

Fuji X-T5 . XF27mm f2.8 WR @ 27mm . f4 . 1/2″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

Battery Life

According to CIPA, the battery life of NP-W235 on X-T5 can achieve 580 shots while 680 shots on X-H2. In my test, I spend about 40% of the battery life in return for 350+ shots. Doing some mathematics calculations, it should achieve about 700 shots or more. Of course, we need to include many factors like how we use the camera, the environment, etc.

Fuji X-T5 . XF35mm f1.4 @ 35mm . f4 . 1/800″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

But for me, the combination of X-T5 and the new battery is really impressive. It could easily last me a whole day with just one battery.

Feedback

With the advantage of 40 megapixels, I hope they will update X-T5 (and X-H2) with more aspect ratios such as X-Pan 65:24 and any other ratios that GFX gets to enjoy. Although cropping can be done in post, but it will be even better if we have this option right from the camera.

Fuji X-T5 . XF23mm f1.4 WR @ 23mm . f1.4 . 1/80″ . ISO 400 . Nostalgic Negative
Fuji X-T5 . XF23mm f1.4 WR @ 23mm . f1.4 . 1/80″ . ISO 400 . Nostalgic Negative

I have mentioned this before in my X-H2 review but I want to highlight it here again. 40 megapixels is a big resolution and I believe not everyone who upgrades to X-T5 wishes to have kept the 40-megapixel raw file. I hope to see if there is an option as to what raw resolution (i.e. large, medium, small) we want to keep, similar to other brands with such offerings. This can be done easily via firmware updates.

Fuji X-T5 . XF70-300mm f4-5.6 @ 78.3mm . f5.6 . 1/300″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

If Fujifilm reads this, I hope they can consider these as future firmware updates.

Something worth taking note of:

When you turn the ISO dial, make sure that the Drive dial is not turning together with the ISO dial. Because in my testing, I do turn the Drive dial by accident. Thanks to my big fingers. So if goes unnoticed, you will be taking an HDR shot.

Fuji X-T5 . XF23mm f1.4 WR @ 23mm . f1.4 . 1/200″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

Others

The 3-way tilting LCD screen has a good resolution pump. This does help a lot especially when I do I use focus peaking for my manual lens shooting and also improves viewing the image sharpness.

Fuji X-T5 . XF70-300mm f4-5.6 @ 127.1mm . f8 . 1/5400″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative
Fuji X-T5 . XF27mm f2.8 WR @ 27mm . f2.8 . 1/40″ . ISO 640 . Nostalgic Negative

Unfortunately, the EVF resolution remains the same but I am still happy.

There is a 160-megapixel pixel-shift capability too. A good add-on from the X-H2. Unfortunately, I did not spend time testing out this.

Who is this for?

For photographers who have been using Fuji X-T1, X-T2, and X-T3 or X-Txx series, or even the X-Txxx series and are keen to look for a camera body upgrade. This is the camera you can consider getting and I believe it should last us many years ahead.

For X-T4 photographers, you may consider if you really need to upgrade. Personally, I think it is still a good camera to shoot with.

Fuji X-T5 . XF70-300mm f4-5.6 @ 87.5mm . f5.6 . 1/80″ . ISO 200 . Nostalgic Negative

For beginners, this camera is no doubt a great camera to pick up if you have the budget. Photography is an expensive hobby. The investment you put in is not only a camera body and a lens. There are many accessories that need to be filled too. If you have a tight budget, my suggestion is to get a lower-end body with a better lens(es). Because glass is always more important.

In my own words

There are many influencers ranting about why X-T5 overlapping X-H2 and many other things about X-T5. But I can see why and what all this ranting is about. Simply they are not familiar with Fujifilm and Fujifilm’s new directions. They choose to rant than spend time understanding what Fujifilm has changed and the decision Fujifilm made and why X-T5 exists in the first place.

In my opinion, this camera definitely has the biggest upgrades for photographers who are still using X-T3 and earlier models. Gives us the 3-ways tilt screen, IBIS, a good AF system, a new processor, 40 megapixels resolution, and a sleeker retrospective design. From a photography perspective, Fujifilm is not skimmed on the functionalities of the X-T5. In fact, all the X-H2 photography functionalities are packed into X-T5.

Fuji X-T5 . XF23mm f1.4 WR @ 23mm . f1.4 . 1/80″ . ISO 250 . Nostalgic Negative

This camera checks all the upgrades and I believe this is the camera that many Fujifilm fanboys and fangirls will be upgrading with. All because X-T5 is worthy.

Fuji X-T5 . XF35mm f1.4 @ 35mm . f2 . 1/80″ . ISO 200 . Nostalgic Negative

I have placed my order and so do some of my friends. Do you think X-T5 is a good camera? Share with me and discuss.

Thank you for reading.

Disclaimer:
1. All the shots taken here are shot by me.
2. Most of the shots are straight out of the camera with some shots edited via In-Camera Raw Processing.

3. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.
4. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.
5. The camera firmware is 1.42.
6. The photos are resized to 30% of the original size except for cropped ones. If you wish to see the original file, contact me and I am happy to share it with you.

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you have a Facebook account, feel free to join Fujifanboys FB group.

If you like my content and you want to show some support, you can buy me a coffee here.

Event

FujiFanBoys Presents: Strobe Photography Workshops!

All thanks to Ivan and all the main sponsors to make this workshop happened! This is a good opportunity for many photographers who want to explore and learn more with strobe photography, Profoto lights, Eizo monitor, the cable from Tether tools and hands-on with the newly launched X-H2. A total of 3 sessions were organized with 90mins per session and I participated in the first session.

Preparation in progress…
Adjusting the light.

It’s a simple workshop. Ivan started off with a small sharing session together with Profoto and Eizo representatives. Explaining his workflow with strobes and the tools around it. Also explaining what is his preferences with the shots.

Model: Phun

After all the explanations, the hands-on session commenced. Every photographer takes turn to explore shooting model with the strobes set-up.

He is very happy with the shoot begins…
Phun
End of 90 minutes session, Ivan is “welcoming” us off.

Thank you for reading.

Reviews

X-H2 – The best of what APS-C can be (Part II)

4 months later, here comes the second flagship camera from Fujifilm, the X-H2. Every camera manufacturer usually releases one flagship camera to showcase the state-of-the-art technologies that they offer. But this is not the case for Fujifilm, they have a different approach, instead of releasing one flagship camera, they release two flagship cameras.

X-H2

Come to think of this, we have this conception that the flagship camera has to be the one and only one on the top of the lineup. But it is totally common in the mobile phone industry, many manufacturers announced dual, trio or quartet flagship models. Think Apple, Samsung, and Xiaomi. I have nothing against this strategy. Instead, I feel that this is a good move to allow photographers to choose the right option for their needs (speed, resolution, or both) and budgets for their investments.

Fuji X-H2 . XF27mm f2.8 WR @ 27mm . f2.8 . 1/40″ . ISO 160 . Nostalgic Negative

Before I continue with the review, I would like to thank Ms Carmen, Marketing Manager of Fujifilm Singapore, for arranging and loaning the X-H2 for review. By the time this review is online, the camera unit had returned back to Fujifilm Singapore.

Fuji X-H2 . XF35mm f1.4 @ 35mm . f1.4 . 1/2700″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

In this hands-on review, I will do the same approach as I did with the X-H2S; to use various lenses to see how the lenses perform with this new 40 megapixels camera.

Here is the list of lenses I used:

1. XF 16mm f1.4
2. XF 18mm f1.4
3. XF 23mm f2
4. XF 23mm f1.4 WR
5. XF 27mm f2.8 WR
6. XF 35mm f1.4
7. XF 50mm f1
8. XF 50mm f2
9. XF 18-55mm f2.8 – f4
10. XF 70-300mm f4 – f5.6
11. TTArtisan 23mm f1.4
12. TTArtisan 50mm f2
13. TTArtisan 50mm f0.95

To note: As I am not a videography expert, I will not highlight any videography-related content in this post.

Design, Build Quality, Handling & The Shutter…

Everything about its design, build quality, handling, shutter, and EVF are exactly the same as the X-H2S. Since it is totally the same experience so I will not repeat them over here. If you are interested, you can read it in my X-H2S post.

Fuji X-H2 . XF23mm f1.4 WR @ 23mm . f1.4 . 1/105″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

Sensor and Processor

Over here, Fujifilm uses the X-Trans CMOS sensor 5 HR (not the HS, and since the Resolution is the key thing and hence the “R”). The X-Processor 5 is the same as the one equipped with the X-H2S. Similarly, it has the Nostalgic Negative film simulation too, the second APS-C camera to come with this film simulation. Again, I just want to highlight it because I like this film simulation.

Not everything is exactly identical to the X-H2S. Fujifilm has something up its sleeve with this camera. In fact, there are 2 exciting improvements over the X-H2S (at least in my opinion).

The first exciting improvement is that it has the lowest base ISO since X-T3 was introduced with base ISO 160. It is now at ISO 125, which technically speaking will gives a cleaner and higher quality photo.

The second one is even more attention-grabbing, it has a maximum electronic shutter speed of 1/180,000, an increase of approximately 2.5 stops compared to other X-Series cameras (maximum at 1/32,000). In practical usage, I can shoot wide open without the help of using a Neutral-density filter. But I have no idea when I will need this blazing fast shutter speed but it is always good to have this functionality ready.

Image Quality

When rumours are flying around the internet sharing about 40 megapixels sensors, I am sure everyone who reads it is excited but what worried the most to the majority of the photographers including myself is whether the older lenses cannot resolve the sensor well. I am also sure that I am not the only pessimistic person here.

According to the Fujifilm website, they have listed what lenses at wide open can achieve edge-to-edge, high-resolution performance, allowing the photographers to fully experience the 40 megapixels sensor has to offer. They also highlight that lenses that are not listed will allow photographers to experience improved resolution performance of 40 megapixels.

Extract from  https://fujifilm-x.com/global/products/cameras/x-h2/

Okay… Although the message here seems to be a little bit grey area but it sounds not too bad or so it seems to be. It still makes me wonder how good can the old lenses (and 3rd party manual lenses) resolve this high-resolution megapixels?

Truth be told, the images from those lenses turn out to be just fine or slightly better (depending on the individual perspective). They are not as bad as I thought they would be. My personal conclusion is that the old lenses and other manual lenses can resolve newer sensors. But the clarity level might not be as great as the newer lenses or the lenses that Fujifilm listed out there.

Undoubtedly, the number “40” is a new achievement in the APS-C camera category. The previous largest resolution I know is 33 megapixels from Canon. Although getting larger megapixels is always a good thing to have, retaining a decent amount of quality details is more important in my opinion. I’m glad X-H2 delivered it quite well.

There are 2 ways to make full use of the 40 megapixels. The first one is to print out at a whopping 8 meters x 6 meters print but unfortunately, not everyone has the space to hang it. So we talk about the second way and that is having the luxury to crop. While it cannot compare against the GFX cameras that come with 50 megapixels or 100 megapixels, it still has quite a good resolution to crop. Having said that, I am not a person who loves to crop photos. But with this amount of resolution, it does help to do some slight adjustments or creative crop to the photos for me.

Fuji X-H2 . XF23mm f1.4 WR @ 23mm . f5 . 2″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative
One of my favourite crop ratio – 65:24

Performance

The autofocus performance for this camera is blazing fast with newer lenses. As for older lenses (especially without Linear Motor), the camera is still able to perform faster and snappier than equipping them on my X-T3. So I can say that the X-H2’s AF performance is kind of subject to what lenses you are using but the experience is not too far off.

What about comparing both X-H2S and X-H2? Well, the X-H2S indeed performs faster but just narrowly faster. You can only tell the difference when you test both cameras side by side.

Under decent street light situations, the AF performance is decently fast. That said, it is also depending on what lenses you are using to shoot as some older lenses might affect the AF performance by a little.

The eye-AF performance is sufficiently better than the previous generation processor and image sensor. It is much stickier than before and can detect the eye even if the person is putting on a mask. Similar to X-H2S, if there is more than one person in the frame, you may experience the eye-AF jumping back and forth.

IBIS

Consistent with X-H2S, the X-H2 also achieve up to 7 stops compensation with some lenses up to 5 stops. I test with the legendary XF 35mm f1.4 and with some luck, I can manage to snap 0.7-second exposure handheld. For XF18-55mm, I am able to accomplish a 1/2 second result at a higher success rate with my shaky hands.

Fuji X-H2 . XF18-55mm f2.8-4 @ 19.6mm . f4 . 0.7″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative
Fuji X-H2 . XF18-55mm f2.8-4 @ 55mm . f4 . 0.5″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative
Fuji X-H2 . XF35mm f1.4 @ 35mm . f5 . 0.77″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

Battery life

For my usage in the past 2 weeks, I took about 700 shots in one of the days and it is left with approximately 25%. So 1 battery can definitely last me for a day. If I going to overseas travelling, I think bringing 2 extra batteries is more than enough. I probably will not even need to change the battery as often as I did with my X-T3 (which I need to change every half day).

To my surprise, according to CIPA standards, the battery life is rated as 680 shots. So I think they might have tested the battery with maximum performance while I using the normal performance.

Feedback

40 Megapixels is a lot and I believe not every photographer wants to have that full resolution, especially in RAW. At least a friend of mine who is a full-time photographer told me that. He explains that the nature of his work does not require such a big resolution as it will take up more of his processing time.

He hopes to see Fujifilm will take into consideration updating the firmware and implement the option to select the RAW size (i.e. M size RAW and S size RAW). The current setting only allows having M size JPEG and S size JPEG while keeping full resolution RAW.

In my own words

After my 2 weeks of testing, I believe the X-H2 will be the popular option among the dual flagships. Putting the price aside, both cameras’ performances are very identical. Given that the X-H2 has more functionalities improvements like lower base ISO, faster electronic shutter speed and 8K video, I do see why it is more popular than the X-H2S.

Fuji X-H2 . XF70-300mm f4-5.6 @ 122.5mm . f5 . 1/450″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

Now, what excited me is the X-T5. While no one knows when it will be announced and arrive on our shores, but what X-H2 has internally might shed some light on how X-T5 might have. I hope it will keep most functionalities minus the 8K video and some of the videography functions. Sorry, I wish the X-T5 to be a photographer’s camera again and not a hybrid camera like the X-T4.

Who is this for?

This is a great, heavy-duty workhorse camera and I highly recommend it to professionals and pro-consumers who can take advantage of the high resolution it has to offer. If you are struggling between the dual flagships, head down to the camera store and try it out and compare both of them. However, if the photographer wants to own both the speed and resolution, buy both and you can have the best of both worlds.

As for me, it is not for me. As I mentioned before, I am still waiting for the X-T5 arrival and I hope it will have the X-T3 flip and tilt screen. My piggy bank is waiting to get smashed.

Fuji X-H2 . XF50mm f1 WR @ 50mm . f1 . 1/750″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative

Fuji X-H2 . XF50mm f1 WR @ 50mm . f2 . 1/220″ . ISO 125 . Nostalgic Negative
65:24 Cropped

Thank you for reading.

If you like my works, please follows me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

Disclaimer:
1. All the shots taken here are shot by me.
2. All of the shots
 are straight out of the camera with some edited via In-Camera Raw Processing.
3. The photos are resized to 30% of the original size except for cropped ones. If you wish to see the original file, contact me and I am happy to share it with you.
4. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.
5. The camera firmware is 1.00.
6. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.

If you like my content and you want to show some support, you can buy me a coffee here.

Reviews

X-H2S – The best of what APS-C can be

Before all else, I would like to thank Ms Carmen, Marketing Manager of Fujifilm Singapore, for loaning the X-H2S for review. By the time this review is online, the camera unit had returned back to Fujifilm Singapore.

X-H2S

Get started

After months of waiting and numerous rumours flying over the internet, the X-H2S was finally announced in X-Summit OMIYA 2022, together with XF150-160mm and XF18-120mm. Fujifilm categorised it as a flagship model, which means the best of the best technologies Fujifilm can offer is in this camera body (or maybe together with the upcoming X-H2). If I remember correctly, The “H” in X-H stands for “Heavy-duty”.

X-H2S
X-H2S

If you have watched the X-summit, you will know this flagship model addresses three groups of categories: sports photography, wildlife photography and videography.

While I do not belong to any of the three categories and I do street photography most of the time, my perspective of using this camera will be more on people on the streets and things revolving around the streets.

Fuji X-H2S . XF27mm f2.8 WR @ 27mm . f2.8 . 1/5400″ . ISO 160 . Nostalgic Negative
Fuji X-H2S . XF27mm f2.8 WR @ 27mm . f2.8 . 1/80″ . ISO 160 . Nostalgic Negative

Also in this hands-on sharing, it is based on a photographer’s point of view as I am not a videographer trained. To test with people on the streets, I have also used various lenses of mine to see how well this camera can perform.

Here is the list of lenses I used:

  1. XF 16mm f1.4
  2. XF 23mm f2
  3. XF 23mm f1.4 WR
  4. XF 27mm f2.8 WR
  5. XF 35mm f1.4
  6. XF 50mm f2
  7. XF 80mm f2.8
  8. XF 18-55mm f2.8 – f4
  9. XF 70-300mm f4 – f5.6

Let’s begin…

Fuji X-H2S . XF23mm f2 WR @ 23mm . f4 . 1/600″ . ISO 640 . Nostalgic Negative

Sensor and Processor

Fujifilm has come thus far when comes to image sensors and processors. Now, Fujifilm has come out with its first-ever Stacked-Back Side Illuminated (BSI) X-Trans CMOS sensor 5 HS and X-Processor 5. With this new processor, Fujifilm has also introduced Nostalgic Negative film simulation to the APS-C camera. Nostalgic Negative was only made available to GFX (first with GFX 100S) series only. I know not many people actually talk about this film simulation but I just want to highlight how much I like this film simulation after I tested out the GFX 50S II.

Fuji X-H2S . XF35mm f1.4 @ 35mm . f2 . 1/80″ . ISO 640 . Nostalgic Negative

More on the Image quality and performance below.

Design & Build Quality 

When I first saw the camera, it was resemblant very much to the GFX100S/50S II. It is also a totally different design from its predecessor, X-H1. This is a good way to distinguish between models. The new X-H2S can be distinguished easily at a glance too, especially since there is a label “S” on the front of the camera body.

Fuji X-H2S . XF23mm f1.4 WR @ 23mm . f1.4 . 1/80″ . ISO 640 . Nostalgic Negative

The magnesium build camera is sturdy, durable and solid to hold. Something I am expecting from a flagship camera. The weight of the camera is 660 grams but personally, I do not feel it is heavy to hold and I think that because the weight is well distributed across the camera body.

For a note, it is just 53 grams heavier than X-T4 and 13 grams lighter than X-H1.

Handling

X-H2S has an ergonomic handgrip design but some photographers might think it is too large to hold, particularly photographers who have smaller hands. As for me, probably because I have large hands, it is very comfortable to grip. The feeling reminds me much of the good grip I had with my DSLRs back in those days.

Overall buttons are comfortable to press with good tactile feedback. The Focus stick is large and good to navigate focus points and between menus. Nothing to complain about here.

The Shutter

The newly developed shutter button is very sensitive and I have to learn to adapt to it. For most Fuji cameras, I depress half the shutter button for focus and then depress it fully for taking the shots. But then, the shutter button of the X-H2S is probably set it up higher than the other Fuji cameras. I basically snap the shot when I depress “half” the shutter button. It took me a few shots to find the sweet spot. Sometimes I do forget and history repeats itself. It is not something difficult to familiar with, it just takes a while for my muscle memory to familiarise itself.

On a side note, I love the shutter sound. A gentle and very satisfying “tid” sound.

The Viewfinder, The LCD Screen & the Sub-Display

I have to say the viewfinder is really a pleasure to use. The 5.76M dot OLED with a 120fps refresh rate is one of the best improvements Fujifilm has made. It makes the viewing experience so smooth as if I am shooting through an optical viewfinder. (Remember to set to EVF frame rate priority to enjoy the 120fps, otherwise, it is default at 60fps.)

Fuji X-H2S . XF18-55mm @ 18mm . f5 . 1/1600″ . ISO 320 . Nostalgic Negative
Fuji X-H2S . XF18-55mm @ 18mm . f2.8 . 1/120″ . ISO 320 . Nostalgic Negative

However, the LCD screen keeps the same 1.62M dot resolution as the X-T4 but is still better than my X-T3. The display is indeed sharper and it is a good screen to meet my needs.

The “always-on” sub-display reminds me of the DSLR’s sub-display but better. As a sub-display, it provides all the necessary current settings and information to allow one to have a quick view.

Image Quality

The image quality is great and that is across all ISO ranges that I used in this test. Honest speaking, I cannot find anything to fault it. Personally, I feel that the image quality has some improvement at the high ISO range, especially on the ISO 3200. Not a dramatically huge difference but you can tell. Other than that, it is hard to tell the difference between X-H2s and X-T3.

Fuji X-H2S . XF70-300mm @ 300mm . f5.6 . 1/20″ . ISO 1600 . Nostalgic Negative
Fuji X-H2S . XF70-300mm @ 101.6mm . f4.5 . 1/17″ . ISO 3200 . Nostalgic Negative
Fuji X-H2S . XF23mm f1.4 WR @ 23mm . f1.4 . 1/160″ . ISO 3200 . Nostalgic Negative

Performance

The autofocus performance of the camera is kind of limited by the lenses. Because the performance of this X-H2S is really fast, it does push the limit of the older lenses to work faster. If the lens is on the slower side (for example a lens without Linear Motor), you can feel that it works slightly slower and also missing out on some focus tracking (but it picks up pretty fast). That said, the newer lenses (such as XF 23mm f1.4 WR) are really designed to optimise with X-H2S than the older ones. All in all, the autofocus is really snappy and accurate. The older lenses do feel snappier too than having them on my X-T3.

Fuji X-H2S . XF23mm f1.4 WR @ 23mm . f1.4 . 1/80″ . ISO 1000 . Nostalgic Negative

The focus tracking is a real improvement here. The eye-AF together with the Subject Detection such as “Animal”, “Bird”, “Automobile”, etc does pick up well and is quite sticky to the respective subject, especially a moving one. But if there is more than one subject in the frame, then that is another story altogether.

IBIS

On paper, it states that it can achieve up to 7 stops of compensation with some lenses can only go up to 5 stops. In the real world, how stable is it with my shaky hands is more matters to me. The results show everything. I have tested with 4 lenses and it turns out that the IBIS is impressive. Whether it is combined with an OIS lens or not, my handheld results are pretty consistent and terrific.

Fuji X-H2S . XF18-55mm @ 30.2mm . f7.1 . 0.5882″ . ISO 160 . Nostalgic Negative

Battery life

I notice there are some people who commented about the battery life that does not last for the whole day. But in my 2 weeks of testing, it lasts me for the whole day with 35% remaining the least, that is about 500 shots taken.

Based on the CIPA standard, the battery life is rated as 720 shots. And based on my calculation, it is about there. So I think the rating from CIPA is quite consistent with my experience.

Although battery consumption is subjective to individual usage and many other external factors to be considered, all I can say is that this NP-W235 battery is definitely better than the NP-W126S on my X-T3. If your photography consumes more battery power, then just bring another one. If bringing two batteries is insufficient, then make it three.

Fuji X-H2S . XF18-55mm @ 30.2mm . f4 . 1/550″ . ISO 320 . Nostalgic Negative

PASM Dial

PASM dial is something I familiar with for a long time, especially since I used DSLR before. I do not hate it nor I am happy to see it. It just reminded me of how I should operate the camera differs from the one with Fuji-style dials.

Fuji X-H2S . XF16mm f1.4 @ 16mm . f1.4 . 1/85″ . ISO 320 . Nostalgic Negative

I do miss the Fuji-style dials with this X-H2S but handling the PASM dial is not a show stopper for me.

Something else…

The focus mode selector switch has been replaced by the “fn3” button in X-H2S. By default, fn3 is set as the “focus mode selector” function. If you are a person who switches various modes a lot, this might be a little ignoring to you as it takes you to a screen to select the focus mode with your D-pad and the “OK” button to enter instead of instantaneously switching with the switch.

Fuji X-H2S . XF50mm f2 @ 50mm . f2 . 1/150″ . ISO 160 . Nostalgic Negative

Another thing that I do not mention is the memory card. It comes with 2 slots, one for CFexpress Type B card and another for UHS-II. Because I do not have a CFexpress Type B card which unable to verify the capability of read/write speed of the camera when shooting at 40 fps.

Probably some photographers might notice this. The front dial is now not clickable.

One last interesting thing to share, X-H2S is the first Fuji camera that comes with a variable shutter speed. It calls “Flickerless S.S. Setting”. You have to enable “Flicker Reduction” first before you can set the “Flickerless S.S. Setting” on. This helps to eliminate flickering lighting from indoor LED lighting, bulb and monitor screen, etc. Only Manual and Shutter priority modes can enjoy this functionality.

Feedback

For the next generation of X-H series, I hope that the position of the Focus stick to be a little lower, probably beside the AEL button will be a better option. Whenever I want to change the focus point, I need to shift my thumb much higher to reach for the Focus stick and by doing so, I have to reorientate my hand placement on the handgrip.

Fuji X-H2S . XF80mm f2.8 @ 80mm . f2.8 . 1/680″ . ISO 320 . Nostalgic Negative

Another thing I hope Fujifilm can do is on the focus mode selector. Instead of the cumbersome control, you may consider making the fn3 button to toggle between the modes. I believe it will be easier for photographers who need to toggle often. Probably it can be added in a firmware update.

Above are some of the little feedback or more like my personal preference.

In my own words

The grip, the sub-display and the overall size of the camera pretty much reminded me of the good old DSLR era. Oftentimes it also reminded me of how far technology has come.

After 2 weeks of use, I believe Fujifilm has delivered the flagship model very well and beyond my expectation of what a flagship camera can be: a hybrid, heavy-duty camera for both worlds.

Fuji X-H2S . XF35mm f1.4 @ 35mm . f1.4 . 1/280″ . ISO 320 . Nostalgic Negative

For Fuji enthusiastic (who like dials, dials and dials) like me, I will not get it for my personal causal shooting. Yes, the stacked BSI sensor is very attractive to me. The focusing speed and the AF tracking are something my current X-T3 cannot do with. What I can hope is that the future X-T5 has most of what X-H2S or X-H2 has to offer together with the X-T3 flip and tilt screen and I will be ready to smash my piggy bank.

Who is this for?

This is a flagship camera and also a workhorse that is designed with professional photographers (and professional videographers) in mind. It has the best performance Fujifilm has to offer to date. But that does not mean non-professional photographers should not get it. If camera size is not a factor, this X-H2S will be a camera you can consider as it is the pinnacle of Fujifilm for years to come.

Fuji X-H2S . XF23mm f1.4 WR @ 23mm . f8 . 1/900″ . ISO 160 . Nostalgic Negative

Also, Fujifilm also confirmed they will be releasing X-H2 which comes with 40 megapixels in the X-Trans 5 HR. X-H2S focus on speed while X-H2 focus on fine details. Only the photographers themselves will know which camera can meet their demands in photography and the photography genres they are shooting.

Fujifilm just laid out them for you to choose from.

Fuji X-H2S . XF35mm f1.4 @ 35mm . f2.8 . 1/1900″ . ISO 160 . Nostalgic Negative

Thank you for reading.

If you like my works, please follows me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

Disclaimer:
1. All the shots taken here are shot by me.
2. All of the shots
 are straight out of the camera with some edited via In-Camera Raw Processing.
3. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.
4. The camera firmware is 1.01.
5. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.

Reviews

XF18-120mm -A Good Zoom Lens for Photographers?

First of all, I would like to thank Ms Carmen, Marketing Manager of Fujifilm Singapore, for loaning the XF18-120mm and X-S10. By the time this review is online, the units had returned back to Fujifilm Singapore.

Fujifilm XF18-120mm f4 LM PZ WR
Fujifilm XF18-120mm f4 LM PZ WR

In this hands-on experience, I used this lens for photography only and nothing related to videography. Because I do not know about videography, I shall leave it to the experts to review from the videographers’ point of view.

Conclusion (TL;DR)

I am doing something different and decided to push up my conclusion so that you guys can decide to skip or continue to check out this lens.

Over the course of 2 weeks, as a prime lens user, I enjoy every single moment of using it. It brings me back to the fun of using a zoom lens without sacrificing image quality. As for the power zoom functionality, it took me about half a day to get used to it. After all, I started learning photography in the “power zoom” era.

This is a constant f4 lens and it may not have a large aperture like f2 or f2.8 and might not please some potential videographers. But every lens created has its purpose and every lens does come with pros and cons. Just how we weigh them before getting the lens, it’s up to the individual.

Of course, if you are looking for a faster lens than this and they are already existed in the market, the red badge and the MK lenses.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f5.6 . 1/640″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Personally, this lens is a great lens that has great versatility. Fujifilm strikes a good balance between compactness and image quality, is lightweight and has very useful focal lengths. From a photographer’s perspective, this lens is on my recommendation list.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @33.9mm . f4 . 1/1500″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Intro

Fujifilm XF18-120mm f4 LM PZ WR was first teased in X Summit PRIME 2021 and finally announced in X Summit OMIYA 2022. And now, it should starts shipping in September 2022. This lens has a focal length that is equivalent to 27mm – 183mm in the 35mm film format which gives whopping 6.7x times zoom. It is probably the most versatile constant aperture zoom lens from Fujifilm yet.

During the X Summit OMIYA, Fujifilm emphasised that this lens is designed for videographers in mind and based on the expertise Fujifilm has in the broadcast industry. But can photographers use this lens for general photography purposes?

Design & Build Quality & Something more…

For a start, this lens is tall but a tad shorter than XF70-300mm. It comes with a 72mm filter size and internal zoom (yeah!). From the appearance, it gives an impression that this is a heavy lens but the 460 grams on this lens do not feel that way. The lens body is built out of polycarbonate material but I believe these are some of the reasons to explain why. (These are my guesses and not from any official Fujifilm statement.)

Fujifilm XF18-120mm f4 LM PZ WR and Fujifilm XF70-300mm f4-5.6 R LM OIS WR

First, it helps to reduce the overall weight. The lens is designed for portability so that videographers who wish to pair it with any cameras can balance it well and can use it handheld for long hours without stressing the arms.

Second, it might help bring down some costs and allow more potential videographers to reach out for this lens.

On a side note, when the lens and camera are mounted on a gimbal, the videographer does not need to recalibrate the gimbal when changing to any focal length.

Overall, the built quality is great and does not feel cheap at all. For forgetting that it comes with weather-resistant too!

If you have noticed, this lens does not come with an aperture ring. But it comes with 3 ways of zoom functionalities (zoom ring, zoom/focus control ring and zoom button) and a manual focus ring. It also comes with a button named Z/F (Zoom/Focus). This is also the first lens I have ever seen having 3 options to choose from. How do these 3 zoom functions work? Let me try to explain it.

Zoom ring – It works like what it is intended but with a little twist. The focal length actually changes “electronically”. The experience is different from what the usual manual zoom ring has, it does not have that “instant” zoomed focal length. What it gives is a steady zoom in and out. However, I will not recommend photographers to use this zoom ring to change the focal length from 18mm to 120mm and vice versa. The throw is approximately 360° from 18mm to 120mm which takes me 4 times to complete. (Update: the production unit takes approximately 90° from 18mm to 120mm) What I do is to use it as a compliment to the next zoom functionality. For example, some small fine-tuning to the focal length which I feel is easier than using the zoom/focus control ring.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/800″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Zoom/focus control ring – When I use this control ring, it kind of reminded me of my first camcorder. Clockwise for telephoto-zoom and anti-clockwise for wide-zoom. It is that simple. Sometimes, I overshoot the desired focal length, and I come to have a habit of using the zoom ring to adjust. At least it works for me. Of course, you still can use the zoom control ring to adjust to the desired focal length.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/680″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Zoom button – there are 2 buttons, the “up” button for telephoto zoom and the “down” button for wide-zoom. Basically, you press once and it will zoom in or out all the way. Press the button again to stop zooming. I did not use these buttons after exploring how it works and I believe this is more useful for videographers.

Image Quality

Usually, when comes to a zoom lens, especially having such a long zoom, I have this mindset indicating that the image quality is probably somewhere sub-par or slight above sub-par image quality.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f7.1 . 1/280″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Well. I think I have to change my way of thinking. The image quality is great. Sharp and have a good level of contrast. I enjoy the results coming out from this lens. The optical is really great even at wide-open.

It may not have the most bokehlicious result but it does render pretty smooth for a zoom lens. It does not give harsh and hard bokeh at all. As for the sunny star, this lens doesn’t seem to give a sharp one, even at its smallest aperture.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 18mm . f22 . 1/80″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

From my observation, chromatic aberration and vignetting are nowhere to be seen or at least very mild. This is something I am not surprised about as Fujifilm has controlled well in this aspect, especially for all the recent newer lenses.

Focusing

When comes to focusing, I have this repute that the focusing speed for a zoom lens is generally slower than a prime lens. Again, I was wrong but not completely wrong. Under the sun, focusing is pretty fast across all focal lengths. Though it is not blazing fast like the new generation prime lenses like XF23mm f1.4, it is just a tad slower. But when comes to low light situations, the wide to mid-tele focal lengths are still considerably fast. You will know that it is not as fast as the day but it is still within my acceptable range. At 120mm, the little struggle comes in. But I still manage to lock my focus after a few tries. For all that, I think it is expected behaviour for a long focal length like other lenses.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 103.7mm . f4 . 1/34″ . ISO 1600 . Classic Neg

One thing to note is that this lens is capable of optically parfocal, which means my subject is able to stay in focus throughout the entire focal length. But I think it is more useful for videography than photography?

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/40″ . ISO 1600 . Classic Neg

Minimum Focus Distance (MFD)

I also do observe some soft characteristics in the out-of-focus area. I pretty much like this kind of rendering.

The MFD is 60cm. At 18mm, I am not able to get close up, rather, I am pretty far from my subject. When you shoot at 120mm, it appears to be fairly close to the subject. Yet far from what a macro lens can achieve.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/300″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg
Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/15010″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Something to note.

If you power off your camera, the focal length will be where you left off. Say if you shoot at 50mm and then power it off and on again after some time, it will remain at 50mm. That’s also applied even if you swap lenses and then swap back.

If you want to use this lens to shoot streets, you can but this lens is not as discreet as compact prime lenses. Some strangers might even notice you first before you shoot them.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/480″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Side by Side

This range of focal length is always very competitive and Fujifilm has quite a few zoom lenses somewhat close to one another in the market. Namely, XF16-80mm, XF18-135mm, and the most underrated XF18-55mm. Not forgetting about the recently announced Tamron 17-70mm f2.8 and upcoming Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 too. Having said that, the most direct competition, for now, is the XF16-80mm.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 57.9mm . f4 . 1/85″ . ISO 640 . Classic Neg
Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 52.5mm . f4 . 1/20″ . ISO 1000 . Classic Neg

Both are constant f4 lenses. The typical advantages between both lenses are pretty noticeable. One wider, one has more reach, OIS versus non-OIS. While I do not test the XF16-80mm fully, I understand from some photographers that the lens is soft at wide open. And I may be biased, but the X18-120mm seems to have better image quality. Nevertheless, at the end of the day, both lenses serve different groups of photographers.

Who is this for?

For travelling photographers who might want to go as light as possible, this lens is also a good option to choose from. As this is an f4 lens, which also means that it might be a little struggling for night street shoots, I will suggest pairing it up with an In-Body Image Stabilization camera or an ultra-fast prime lens to go along with it.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/160″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

Because it has such great versatility, it can be used for almost anything from streets, editorial, documentaries, landscapes, cityscapes, product shots, and even portraits.

Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 32.3mm . f4 . 1/105″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg
Fuji X-S10 . Fuji XF18-120mm @ 120mm . f4 . 1/600″ . ISO 160 . Classic Neg

For photographers who do videography occasionally, I also think this is a good piece of glass to have.

Thank you for reading.

Disclaimer:
1. All the shots taken here are shot by me.
2. Some of the shots
 are straight out of the camera while others are edited via In-Camera Raw Processing and Capture One.
3. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.
4. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you like my content and you want to show some support, you can buy me a coffee here.

Discussion

XF23mm f1.4 R – is the Classic still worth buying in 2022?

After three months of delay, the successor of the classic XF23mm f1.4 R has finally arrived on our shore this month. While the price of the newly launched lens is priced at USD 900, the predecessor is easily available between USD 600 to 700~ ish. Is it worth saving the $200 ~ $300 difference? In this post, I will share some of the experiences I had with both lenses and hope to help you in your own decision journey.

XF23mm f1.4 R
XF23mm f1.4 R
XF23mm f1.4 R

Before I start my sharing, I would like to thank Ivan Joshua Loh for lending me his XF23mm f1.4 R for a shoot. This has actually landed me an opportunity to have a full 2 days of hands-on with the classic lens.

Image Quality

The classic one gives an overall decent image quality all most focusing distance but I noticed soft results at its minimum focus distance. Chromatic aberration is also quite noticeable, especially in an outdoor sunny environment and shooting wide open. As for the new one, it produces sharper image quality and addresses those flaws that I mentioned earlier. The rendering of the bokeh also seems to be better than the classic one. More pleasant to the eyes if you ask me.

For the new F23mm f1.4 R LM WR, you can have a look at photos taken here and here.

Autofocus speed

This is a very subjective topic when comes to focusing performance. How fast or slow depends on how the individual defines it. Unfortunately, I have both the classic and new lenses mounted on different camera bodies (due to different loan periods) but the cameras are equipped with X-Trans 4 (if that is the concern). For reference, X-E4 is for the classic lens and X-S10 is for the new lens.

To my surprise, the classic one is not that slow with the newer camera. The focusing speed is acceptably fast and I do not really experience any slow-focusing or focus hunting under dim light conditions. However, it is surely noisy.

For the new lens, the focusing speed is indeed very fast and silent. It locks onto the subject really quick and precise.

Minimum Focus Distance

If you are like me who like to take as close up as possible, the classic is not for you. It’s minimum focus distance is at 28 cm as compared to 19cm on the new one.

Size and Weight

To be honest, they are somewhat close to each other. The overall size and weight is nothing much to shout about or compare. While one is slightly wider and shorter, the other is slightly taller and slimmer. Both are about the same weight and still bigger than the f2 variant.

Appearance

The classic one comes with the push/pull clutch manual focus ring. The aperture ring is close to clickless. Overall, the lens gives a very vintage style design element.

As for the new one, it is totally the opposite of the classic. Fujifilm has removed the push/pull clutch, gives the aperture ring better clicky feedback and modernize the overall lens design. Plus it includes the Weather Resistant (WR).

Conclusion

The successor iso truly the winner here. I can see how much effort Fujifilm has improved the lens in almost every aspect of the classic one.

Back to the question. Is it worth saving the $200 ~ $300 difference? Ideally, getting the latest glass is always the better choice. If you have no financial constraints, this is the way to go.

X-E4 . XF23mm f1.4 R @ F5.6

But if you are just picking up photography with a limited budget, I think there are a few more options besides getting the used XF23mm f1.4 R. I think starting off with 3rd party lenses from Sigma and Viltrox is also another good option (if you are willing to accept their strengths and drawbacks).

X-E4 . XF23mm f1.4 R @ F1.4

What is your opinion? Share with me in the comment below or DM me in instagrams. Cheers!

As for me, I have a lot of concerns when purchasing a used lens and that’s just my two cents. I am kind of biased to the successor and that’s because I started using the successor before using the classic lens. On that account, I have unconsciously set a high standard for image quality and I cannot turn it back. Yes, it is not a cheap lens but it is unarguably a futureproofing lens for the newer camera bodies which will harness the power of the lens.

X-E4 . XF23mm f1.4 R @ F1.4

Disclaimer:
1. All the shots taken here are shot by me.
2. Some of the shots
 are straight out of the camera while others are edited via In-Camera Raw Processing and Adobe Lightroom Classic.
3. The opinions are based on my experience. If there is any mistake, please kindly drop me a message and I will gladly make the amendment.
4. I reserve ownership of these images, if you wish to use my images, please notify me.

Thank you for reading.

If you like my works, please follow me on either one of the 2 Instagram accounts:

https://www.instagram.com/alwinkok_

https://www.instagram.com/alwin.portraits

If you like my content and you want to show some support, you can buy me a coffee here.